Quarantine measures adopted by Taipei Municipal Hoping Hospital to prevent the spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome have triggered protests from some medical workers. These protests are a warning that we must reflect on a long-forgotten question: is medicine a profession, or is it a vocation?
If it is a profession, those people certainly have the right to protest or even fight back when their interests are damaged. However, if it is a vocation, then those health-care workers who were unwilling to fulfill their duties in a difficult time should seek new careers after the quarantine period is over. The government should also help them fulfill their wish.
Since ancient times, the work of physicians and clergymen have been viewed as sacred callings. In other words, they engage in the work of saving people because of their inner calling. It is a ministry, not an occupation. They decide to devote themselves to care for the masses and not to flinch from the task.
Along with the relativization and vulgarization of values, what our forebears believed to be sacred vocations have become mundane jobs. People no longer do such work because of their spiritual calling. Rather, they view it merely as a livelihood.
Of course, many medical workers still uphold the spirit of benevolence and quietly dedicate themselves to the work of helping others.
I have witnessed many health-care workers and employees from the Department of Health working tirelessly day and night at hospitals and in their offices without making any complaint at this difficult time. Respect spontaneously arose in my heart for them. They deserve our salute.
In a material society -- where everything is measured by money, power and status -- many people who choose the medical field no longer do it in response to a calling. Rather, they are merely motivated by the incentive of material gain. The criticism of medical workers in Taiwanese society over the past few decades has been due to the fact that some people work only for their material gain. A sincere devotion to caring for the sick is completely lacking.
The well-known sociologist, Max Weber, stressed that those who engage in politics only to pursue their personal gains and privilege are politicians, not statesmen. If they always opt for the middle road and refuse to adopt brave policies to build a concrete, strong and indigenous national identity, they are but power-mongers.
By the same token, if health-care workers seek only their own personal gain and refuse to suffer with the sick while an epidemic strikes, they are merely profit-seekers unworthy of people's respect.
Taiwan's education has long failed to nurture in students an attitude of serving people. Medical work therefore is viewed as a profession, not a vocation. The spirit of dedication has been lost.
We should not put all the blame on those protesting at Hoping Hospital. Out of concern for their families, they naturally felt agitated when they were suddenly isolated without any advanced warning.
It might be a good thing if this can prompt the public to reflect on the meaning of a "calling." Those who cannot dedicate themselves wholeheartedly to their work but seek only fame and fortune should drop the idea of becoming medical professionals.
There is certainly no chance to put them to test in peaceful times, but no one knows when a contingency will occur. I hope the SARS challenge can provide the public and those in education circles with an opportunity for soul-searching.
Michael Tai is dean of the Faculty of General Education and chairman of the Department of Social Medicine at Chungshan Medical University.
Translated by Francis Huang and Jackie Lin
Congressman Mike Gallagher (R-WI) and Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL) led a bipartisan delegation to Taiwan in late February. During their various meetings with Taiwan’s leaders, this delegation never missed an opportunity to emphasize the strength of their cross-party consensus on issues relating to Taiwan and China. Gallagher and Krishnamoorthi are leaders of the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party. Their instruction upon taking the reins of the committee was to preserve China issues as a last bastion of bipartisanship in an otherwise deeply divided Washington. They have largely upheld their pledge. But in doing so, they have performed the
It is well known that Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) ambition is to rejuvenate the Chinese nation by unification of Taiwan, either peacefully or by force. The peaceful option has virtually gone out of the window with the last presidential elections in Taiwan. Taiwanese, especially the youth, are resolved not to be part of China. With time, this resolve has grown politically stronger. It leaves China with reunification by force as the default option. Everyone tells me how and when mighty China would invade and overpower tiny Taiwan. However, I have rarely been told that Taiwan could be defended to
It should have been Maestro’s night. It is hard to envision a film more Oscar-friendly than Bradley Cooper’s exploration of the life and loves of famed conductor and composer Leonard Bernstein. It was a prestige biopic, a longtime route to acting trophies and more (see Darkest Hour, Lincoln, and Milk). The film was a music biopic, a subgenre with an even richer history of award-winning films such as Ray, Walk the Line and Bohemian Rhapsody. What is more, it was the passion project of cowriter, producer, director and actor Bradley Cooper. That is the kind of multitasking -for-his-art overachievement that Oscar
Chinese villages are being built in the disputed zone between Bhutan and China. Last month, Chinese settlers, holding photographs of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), moved into their new homes on land that was not Xi’s to give. These residents are part of the Chinese government’s resettlement program, relocating Tibetan families into the territory China claims. China shares land borders with 15 countries and sea borders with eight, and is involved in many disputes. Land disputes include the ones with Bhutan (Doklam plateau), India (Arunachal Pradesh, Aksai Chin) and Nepal (near Dolakha and Solukhumbu districts). Maritime disputes in the South China