A side from the infrastructure damage and civilian suffering and death implied by the cynical term "collateral damage," all wars have environmental effects. The extent of environmental damage depends on a war's duration, the weapons used, and the type of terrain and ecosystems in which it takes place.
Now that the main combat in the Iraq war is over, the final environmental toll of the fighting can be uncovered through comprehensive on-the-ground analyses and the release of previously privileged information. Neither of these steps has yet occurred, but, based on my experiences in 1991, when I led a UN team studying the environmental effects of the first Persian Gulf war, several observations are possible.
Some reports described the sandstorms in south central Iraq in the first week of the war as "sent by Allah against the aggressors." In fact, US and British troops may have only themselves to blame. Increased sand drift was one of the effects noted during and after the first Gulf war. This is because the desert in the region normally has a crust, what Arabs call "the desert skin," consisting of sand and clay particles that have been baked together, or sintered, by the heat and sun.
ILLUSTRATION: MOUNTAIN PEOPLE
Sometimes this crust is strong enough to carry a person and sometimes not, much like the hard ice crust that develops on snow in colder climates. Under the crust, the sand particles are loose. Crushed by the bands and wheels of military vehicles, explosions of bombs and mines, and digging of trenches and walls, the desert's crust is broken and the fine sand particles beneath it are exposed to the wind.
In the first Gulf war, this resulted in "rolling" sand dunes, sometimes 10m high and several kilometers long, that covered roads and buildings. Finer particles became airborne and caused environmental and health problems across northeastern Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and southwestern Iraq. It took between five and 10 years for this effect to abate.
The unusual intensity of the sandstorms in Iraq is most likely the result of the same process. But the consequences of the increased mobility of sand are likely to be far worse than they were in Kuwait, where in the absence of significant agriculture and forests, the impact was mainly on technical systems and infrastructure. In Iraq, a large agricultural sector operates on fairly marginal lands, where farmers fight a constant battle against salt intrusion and face severe water shortages. Drifting sand may frequently tip the balance to unsustainability, threatening the livelihoods of entire districts.
Another serious problem is the use of ozone-depleting substances, such as halons and freons. Halogenated fire retardants are added to the fuel tanks of combat airplanes, causing massive damage to the stratospheric ozone layer. Some 60 to80,000 combat missions were reportedly been flown in the Iraq war, releasing an estimated 2,000 tonnes of ozone-destroying halons. Stealth bombers and fighters, meanwhile, use freon fuel additives to reduce the number of exhaust particles that could otherwise be detected by enemy sensors.
Following international agreements such as the Montreal Protocol on the Protection of the Ozone Layer, global emissions of ozone-depleting substances have otherwise been substantially reduced. The Iraq war emissions may therefore reach the equivalent of three months of normal global civilian release.Burning oil fields were a vivid image -- and a major part -- of the environmental damage caused by the first Gulf war. The six or seven Iraqi fields currently ablaze are a pittance compared to the six hundred that burned in Kuwait. The smoke over Baghdad came mostly from oil deliberately burned in ditches and trenches to obscure potential targets from air attack. Those emissions were insignificant from a global or regional point of view, but oil-drenched particles will likely have adverse health effects for local inhabitants and combatants. Such effects could be reinforced by the addition of metals to the oil in order to confuse bombs' guidance systems.
During the war in Kuwait, the Iraqis pumped massive amounts of oil into the Persian Gulf, resulting in the world's largest-ever oil spill -- some fifty times the amount released from the tanker Prestige off the Spanish coast last fall. Nothing similar happened this time. Similarly, large-scale bombings of Iraqi industry, power plants and infrastructure in 1991 resulted in substantial chemical spills into the Tigris and Euphrates rivers. Nothing on a similar scale has been reported in this war.
In the first Gulf war it was also found that the Iraqis' Soviet-built tanks and artillery had PCBs (poly-chlorinated biphenyls) in their hydraulic systems for the same reason that combat airplanes use halons. When destroyed, such as on the road north from Kuwait City, the PCBs leaked into the ground. The extent of destruction of Iraqi tanks during this war is not yet public information, but the same ground pollution can be expected.
Finally, most of the ammunition used in wars consists of nitrogen compounds. Whether they explode or not, these compounds are hardly benign environmentally, posing risks for both ecosystems and human health.These initial considerations cover only a small range of the conceivable environmental effects of the Iraq war. Destroyed water and wastewater treatment facilities, use of depleted uranium in anti-tank missiles, and ground water contamination may well lead to a host of other problems.
For now, limited information makes any accurate assessment impossible. However, whichever administration governs Iraq in the future must be prepared to face up to an environmental debt -- the cost of restoring what can be restored -- that will be a substantial liability for years to come.
Arne Jernelov is professor of environmental biochemistry, an honorary scholar and former director of the International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis in Vienna, and a UN expert on environmental catastrophes.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs