"I see WHO's role as being the moral voice... in improving health of the people of the world. I see our purpose to be combating disease and ill-health... in all countries."
-- Dr Gro Harlem Brundtland, Director-General, World Health Organization.
Imagine the following scenario. A chilling new disease, mysterious and deadly, originating from Syria, spreads across the Middle East. Israel, through a combination of good governance, a capable and efficient public health system, and luck, is spared the ordeal experienced by her neighbors. It is later discovered that Syria has lied about the development and origins of this disease, covering up for many months the extent to which it has ravaged her population, allowing it to spread, and hindering international efforts to curb it.
Israel, neighboring Syria, quite rightly asks for the to WHO help in its continued fight against this disease, but because of Arab and Muslim opposition, the world health body refuses to send delegations or medical staff into Israeli territories, while sending in team after team into Damascus, despite Syria's continued lies and hindrances.
I would imagine that the official reaction from the administration of US President George W. Bush to this injustice would be nothing short of spectacular.
Of course this scenario is fiction, although not completely. Substitute China for Syria and Taiwan for Israel and you have the sad situation facing this island democracy. While SARS spreads across Asia and WHO specialists race from small villages to major cities across this vast continent, the people of Taiwan (and by extension the rest of the world, what hits Taipei tomorrow will end up in major American cities within a month) are needlessly exposed to greater risk by the WHO boycott of their country.
For years, Taiwan has tried to become an observer member of the WHO, and for years this application has been denied because of objections lodged by the communist dictatorship in Beijing. While the rest of the world will trade with and reap the financial benefits of a relationship with Taiwan, apparently the international community objects to the notion of maintaining the health and well-being of Taiwan's 23 million citizens.
While Taiwan has valiantly staved off the worst effects of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), China has consistently prevaricated and stymied the efforts of the medical community to investigate the origins of this new disease. Yet, it is China which is allowed to determine who shall and who shall not be afforded recognition by international health organizations.
Today and tomorrow, US Senator Bill Frist, along with several of his colleagues, will be in Taipei for a 24-hour stopover on their Easter recess Asia junket. This brief visit is a perfect opportunity for Frist to publicly reaffirm the US' strong support for Taiwan's entry into the WHO.
America's commitment to Taiwan must be shown, not just in the eventuality of war, but also in times of medical crisis. If anyone should know about the dangers of medical neglect, it would be the good doctor.
David Ragsdale is a freelance writer based in Taipei.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with