The recent action of KMT Legislator Yu Yueh-hsia (
For a long time the Legislative Yuan has lacked a formal mechanism governing the procedure of policy debate between the ruling and opposition parties. As a result the floor becomes an arena where vulgar politicians stage their shows. Some insightful people often cannot help but sigh with grief and say, "How could these people have gotten elected?" But under the current electoral system, these legislators or mischief-makers who are so disliked by many voters often get elected with a high percentage of votes. Worse yet, the more daring they are in stage shows, the more likely they are to get re-elected.
Our legislators are elected by an unusual single non-transferable vote system with multi-member districts. Candidates can get elected by winning over heartfelt support from a small proportion of special voters or groups. There is no need for the candidates to seek acceptance from the majority of voters. Even if more than 90 percent of voters in a single district extremely dislike a particular candidate, he or she can still get elected with support from 5 percent of voters and can claim that he or she represents this district.
As a result, candidates often seek unorthodox campaign strategies, try to get benefits from special interest groups, bring in "black gold," or even bribe and buy votes. These have all become the common means by which they play their role and run for elections.
For many years, all walks of life have called for electoral reforms to be the top priority in the Legislative Yuan. If the future electoral system adopts a single-member district, two-vote system, candidates in any district will need to win support from the majority of voters to get elected. Then, many of the problems related to the irrational policymaking process in the legislature will vastly improve.
For comprehensive legislative reforms, there are two additional targets of reform besides the electoral system. One is the revision of the Legislative Yuan's internal regulations, including those governing the system of interpellation, committees, inter-party negotiations and special interests. The functions of the disciplinary and rule-making committees must be strengthened to gradually establish a legislative culture that embodies a seniority system, committee professionalism and a rational policymaking process.
Another target of reform is the completion of a set of sunshine laws, including the enactment of a political-donation law, a political-party law, a lobby law and the revision of the Election and Recall Law (選舉罷免法). Step by step, all of these sunshine laws will help to create a fair, open, transparent, clean legislative environment.
The greatest obstacle to legislative reform is that these reform measures must be initiated and passed by the legislators-to-be-reformed. This explains why the reform of the electoral system has not been passed eight years after it was first proposed, despite support from all the parties.
The Yu incident is perhaps another turning point for legislative reform. If various parties still remain unconcerned about reform, perhaps the angry voters can only resort to a referendum to thoroughly reform the legislature.
Wang Yeh-lih is a professor of political science at Tunghai University.
Translated by Grace Shaw
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations