Between a lawyer and a business management guru, who is more veracious? This is a real toss up for most people. Such a question might even give some people the inspiration for more lawyer and manager jokes. In any event, it is a clear depiction of the debate over the future of China between Gordon Chang, a former China-based American lawyer who wrote the book The Coming Collapse of China, and Kenichi Ohmae, a Japanese management scholar who wrote The Emergence of the United States of Chunghwa. The titles of the books are essentially self-explanatory proclamations about the diametrically opposite predictions each author makes about the future of China.
The divergent conclusions reached by the two academics reflect their differing professional backgrounds. As a lawyer, Gordon based his prediction that China will collapse within the time span of five to 10 years mostly on the social, political, legal and structural problems currently facing China. Conversely, Ohmae, who is essentially a businessman, based his prediction (that by 2005 Taiwan will be politically integrated into China in a federal form) mostly on financial and economic statistics and figures.
In reality, these social and economic factors are mixed with each other to produce unpredictable and complex results. It is fair to say that Ohmae underestimates the potential impact of political and social problems in China, while Gordon commits a similar error by undervaluing economic development.
The two make accurate and in-depth observations about contemporary China. If one pieces their disparate observations together, a relatively complete picture of China might emerge -- a nation with a thriving economy, that is rife with political, social and other structural undercurrents. But it would be naive to fully embrace either author's conclusion as an accurate prognostication of things to come.
Ohmae assumes that China's economy will continue to grow and thrive, forever improving and progressing undisturbed by political and social factors that might slow down or even interrupt positive economic development. Gordon, however, assumes that the political and social problems he has highlighted will have a chance to reach the boiling point. He misjudges the Chinese regime's ability and determination to suppress such problems with an iron fist as well as the degree to which China's people might be willing to put up with oppression -- the lack of human rights, endemic corruption and so forth -- for unfulfilled promises and the remote chance of prosperity under a thriving economy.
While Ohmae has criticized the statistics cited by Gordon as "outdated," he himself makes the mistake of overly relying on statistics released by the Chinese government. Evidently, the Chinese government's recent handling and concealment of the extent of its SARS epidemic is an indication of how far it will go in lying to the general public to protect the interests of its rulers. It is customary for China to deliberately paint rosy pictures by "touching up" statistics so as to attract foreign investors. At least both Gordon and Ohmae concede that Taiwan is already an independent sovereign country. Ironically, that is just about the only issue on which the two authors agree.
Taiwan Think Tank president Chen Po-chi's (
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry