Recent media reports carried President Chen Shui-bian's (
The United Daily News even quoted Chen as saying that Taiwan was able to keep its sovereignty and dignity from being destroyed solely because Washington sent its aircraft carriers when Beijing threatened us with its missiles before the 1996 presidential election.
This statement was indeed shocking. According to the above idea, the democratic society that we have worked so hard to build would never exist without US military support, and Taiwan's sovereignty and dignity is backed solely by US military power. If this is really true, then Taiwan's democracy is fragile. The country will hardly be able to hold the next presidential election if Washington does not take any military action once Beijing threatens us by force at that time.
The legitimacy of this war is obviously insufficient in view of world opinion. Under such circumstances, the government should think and move cautiously before supporting the US military action in Iraq. Taipei must take international justice into account even if it has no choice but to support the US.
The government should also be careful when voicing support for Washington, in order to highlight the independence and autonomy of this nation. Government officials' comments on the Iraq issue appear to be excessive. They were not only unnecessary, but also reflected unfavorably on Taiwan.
The nation has relied on the US for a long time, especially for security. It is indeed impossible for the government to oppose the Iraqi war. Indeed, our safety would be seriously threatened without the 1954 Sino-American Mutual Defense Treaty and the 1979 Taiwan Relations Act (TRA).
But Taiwan is an independent sovereignty. It should never completely rely on the US. Nor should it voice unconditional support for the military action that has violated international justice.
Chen said that he was surprised that some people do not support the government's current anti-terrorism stance. He posed the question of whether the government should be supporting Iraq if it was not supporting the US and that what good it would do if this country were to talk like China.
Such words are superfluous. They reveal that Chen's and government decisionmakers' thinking on national security may be flawed. In fact, those who oppose the US-led war do not oppose the government's anti-terrorism stance, not to mention that none of the anti-war activists in Taiwan support Iraqi President Saddam Hussein's regime. Chen's "dichotomous language" was inappropriate.
Taiwan can learn much from the US-Iraq war. The ruling and opposition camps should try to understand the war with a rational attitude in order to improve this country's national security strategies.
Taking a long-term view, the government should construct in-depth political ideologies that uphold human rights and democracy -- so it can lay a solid foundation for national security and its overall policy. It should not take national security or interests as its only concern.
Given the anti-war sentiments around the world, blind loyalty to the US may damage Taiwan's international image.
Chiu Hei-yuan is a research fellow in the Institute of Sociology at the Academia Sinica.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry