Recently someone raised the idea of setting targets for reducing water usage nationwide to resolve the nation's water shortages. I would like to remind these people that, when setting reduction targets, one should consider their effect on industrial use as well as on the environment.
Different sectors are said to be able to endure different levels of water shortages -- industry 15 percent, domestic users 10 percent, agriculture 40 percent. But while the first two sectors can develop water-conservation habits after long-term reductions, a lack of water in agriculture can damage the environment.
Research and evaluation is necessary before any measures are taken. I have a few suggestions for dealing with the perceived inconvenience and public panic caused by water shortages and rationing.
Taiwan receives 81.6 billion tonnes of rain per year, generating 61.4 billion tonnes of runoff and 3.6 billion tonnes in groundwater percolation. Only 12 billion tonnes of surface water is now used, while groundwater is overused at 6.5 billion tonnes (the reasonable usage level should be 3.6 billion tonnes). A total of 48 billion tonnes of water flows into the sea each year. Authorized water rights total 38.8 billion tonnes. Of this, 6.6 billion tons is groundwater and 32 billion tonnes is surface water.
The drought season can be shortened by utilizing existing water acquisition and supply facilities to intercept and store water in underground storage sites or large numbers of agricultural ponds in the rainy season (from May to October) for use in the drought season. Wet-farming fields left fallow since Taiwan's WTO entry can be used to build ponds and store water.
Since the country joined the WTO, the area of farmland left fallow has reached 40,000 hectares this year, and the figure may increase in the coming years. Leaving the land fallow or using it for non-recyclable purposes will damage the ecology as well as the livelihoods of future generations. Why don't we allow those who need water to build ponds and store water, thereby increasing their ability to save water during the rainy season?
Apart from encouraging and supporting the development of water resources, the government can also amend laws so as to allow such developed water resources to be used in different categories at different times and places, or exchanged between them through negotiation.
The demand for water quality and volume can be graded according to the different categories of water usage. For example, water for industrial use can be divided into manufacturing and non-manufacturing use. Water for household use can be divided into potable and non-potable water. Water for agricultural use can be divided into polluted and non-polluted water.
Water for drinking and manufacturing requires high quality and small volume. Using water that is not heavily polluted for agricultural purposes is not harmful. It is therefore necessary for the government to establish a graded water usage system. This can promote users in all categories to recycle water between them and to develop water resources. This, combined with the above-mentioned flexible water resources provided by a negotiation and exchange mechanism, can help resolve the current water shortages and rationing. Of course, pushing these tasks require time and regulations.
Intent on resolving the problem of reduced agricultural water usage affecting the environment, the government plans to set aside 1 billion tonnes of water per year for ecological conservation. This is a conscientious measure that deserves kudos. But research should be done as soon as possible on how to develop and use such resources. My suggestion is to amend the law and to establish a mechanism whereby users in the different categories can negotiate swapping and even trading water.
Businesses whose water usage does not benefit the environment should be regulated by law to develop equivalent amounts of water resources for use in ecological conservation before they can receive water from suppliers. In concrete terms, community developers should find ways to build ponds and store rain water, or to use low-level purified water for watering plants and cleaning. Factories should also lease or buy fallow farmland on which to build ponds and store water for use in environmental conservation.
Water is an essential resource. In addition to determined and well-planned action on the government's part, the entire public must also show concern in order to resolve the problems.
Lee Yuan-chuan is dean of the College of Science and Engineering at I-shou University.
Translated by Francis Huang
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs