Last week, two notable incidents of violence occurred on the streets of Taipei -- famous political columnist Chin Heng-wei (
No less worrisome is the escalation of the verbal violence to which lawmakers typically resort in order to gain the media's spotlight. Hidden under the protective umbrella of speech immunity, legislators often tread far beyond the bounds of reason and decency. Sometimes, this is only to retaliate for personal grudges or simply to oppose things for the sake of opposition. As a result, the people are not getting high-quality performance from lawmakers.
These physical and verbal incidents of violence simply perpetuate the "an eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth" vicious cycle. Such conduct has become a model through which the ethnic groups and political parties oppose each other.
If incidents of violent behavior continue to be exhibited by the media and entertained on the floor of the legislature in ways that inflame ethnic tensions, it will be difficult for the next generation to follow the same path. Under the circumstances, how can anyone expect the culture and conduct of the next generation to become more refined? Being exposed to such a violent environment on a long term basis, it is doubtful that the next generation can become civilized members of the international community.
Taiwan has often been criticized as "an affluent but uncivilized society." The people here may have money, but they lack good manners. Nor do they do things the way civilized people do. Aside from the few intellectuals who are capable of introspective criticism, most people do not realize what Taiwan's problems are. So even the lawmakers continue to use retaliatory mentality and even carry on with the most primitive type of brutal jungle combat. This is a phenomenon that ought to be a source of great shame for Taiwanese.
However, no one can deny that ethnic rivalries continue to be the root of most of Taiwan's problems. After the change of ruling power, through which the rulers and the ruled exchanged roles, it was inevitable that conflict would take place. The group that came from China, which used to have a political monopoly, feels bitter about losing their clout. Influenced by a severe case of "victim mentality," they escalate the tension in order to protect their interests as a minority group. On the other hand, after the Taiwanese became their own masters, they did not forget the past oppression they suffered. A strong sense of vengefulness continues to dictate their behavior. As a result, the two sides became polarized.
Everyone knows that only time can close these wounds, and that it may take another generation or two before the inhabitants of this land can establish a common identity. But the ethnic and political rivalries taking place right now are consuming resources unnecessarily. In comparison with the rapid development of its surrounding neighbors, Taiwan's society is obviously regressing in this respect. If things continue this way, it is pointless to have any hope for the competitiveness of this country.
Wake up, people of Taiwan.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations