As war in the Persian Gulf looms large, North Korea has rapidly escalated its provocations of the US in order to lend a hand to fellow axis-of-evil nation Iraq and also extort more concessions from the US.
Part and parcel of this has been a re-enactment over the Sea of Japan of the April 2001 incident in which a Chinese J-8 fighter challenged a US EP-3 surveillance plane. The difference was that North Korea used four Soviet-made MiG-19 fighters. Learning from China's experience, they kept a slightly greater distance from the "enemy" to avoid a collision. But since they succeeded in "locking on" to the US plane, the sense of alarm on the US side isn't hard to imagine.
If such an incident were to occur over Iraq, US fighters could open fire, but, of course, an EP-3 isn't a fighter, so the US had no choice but to suppress its anger. Moreover, since attention is now focused on Iraq, incidents on the Korean front must be handled in a low-key manner. A total of 24 B-1 and B-52 long-range bombers have been deployed from the US mainland to Guam, however, where they can deter rash action on North Korea's part by bringing the country within bombing range. Unfortunately, if conflict does break out, these bombers will still arrive too late to deliver an initial devastating blow to North Korea's missile bases or to the 300 long-range artillery pieces that threaten Seoul.
Faced with this crisis in Northeast Asia, the US must consider the problem strategically. It might consider deploying a missile defense system encompassing Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan, but it isn't feasible for the US to shoulder the entire burden of regional security. Recently the US has encouraged Taiwan to take more responsibility for its own security, and, by the same logic, South Korea and Japan, which are threatened by North Korea, should also take more responsibility for themselves.
The US has already let it be known that its troops could be withdrawn from South Korea. In the face of threats from terrorist states, these countries will need to assist one another as well as work with the US. It follows that they should form an alliance, a North Pacific Treaty Organization (NPTO) along the lines of NATO.
NATO was established in April 1949 with the objective of countering the expansion of the communist bloc headed by the Soviet Union. Since the collapse of the Soviet Union, the world has continued to have to contend with what is now referred to as terrorist activity, which adheres to the tenet of "unrestricted warfare" and targets ordinary civilians. Sometimes it is also state-sponsored. So there is as much reason for NATO's continued existence as there was in the past.
In the 1991 Persian Gulf War, the 1999 war in Kosovo, and the current crisis in the Middle East, for example, NATO worked to iron out internal differences, achieve consensus and eradicate evil forces. The presence in North Asia of many of the nations that threaten world peace and human dignity -- nations like North Korea and its supporters -- makes the case for a new treaty group.
At present, democratic nations in the North Pacific region include the US, Canada, Japan, Taiwan, South Korea, and Russia. Since Russia still hasn't joined NATO and still carries extensive baggage from its communist past, there might be some hesitancy regarding its inclusion in an NPTO. But Russia's relations with NATO are improving all the time. Since an NPTO would not be aimed at containing Russia (even if Russia does have certain interests involving North Korea), Russia would likely not be adamantly opposed to the grouping. It might even opt to join out of its common interest with the US in countering fundamentalist Islamic terrorism.
The key question may be China's reaction, which will be a clear test of China's sincerity about opposing terrorism. If China truly opposes terrorism, it should not oppose this plan but actively support it. On the other hand, if China still supports North Korea's challenges to the free world, then its opposition to the formation of such an organization is inevitable.
As for cross-strait relations, this is a matter for Taiwan and China, and shouldn't affect the larger international effort to fight terrorism. Will Chinese President Jiang Zemin (
Since international terrorist activity also affects peace in Southeast Asia -- as illustrated by terrorist attacks in Indonesia and the Philippines as well as the arrests of many international terrorists in Singapore -- when necessary, an NPTO could expand into the Central and South Pacific to form a powerful front against terrorism across the Asia-Pacific region.
In this way, these regions could protect themselves and coordinate from afar with NATO to contribute to anti-terrorist action in other regions. It must be recognized that terrorism knows no national or regional boundaries.
Paul Lin is a political commentator based in New York.
Translated by Ethan Harkness
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and