Let's face it: everybody screws up. There's not one of us who hasn't. The difference for politicians is that their screw-ups wind up on the front pages of the newspapers. So politicians -- good ones at least -- develop an ability to recover from foul-ups. But sometimes even a smart politician fails to recover when he has really screwed up.
Since next year's presidential election will be almost an exact replay of the 2000 contest between President Chen Shui-bian (
Chen's poor performance over the past three years has demonstrated the DPP's lack of experience in government. How to convince the public that life is better than it was four years ago will be the current administration's greatest challenge.
With the economy still struggling and the unemployment rate surging, Chen has been having a hard time finding a way out. He will not have a chance if he seeks to blame the opposition for holding him back in almost every matter.
Some progress has been made in terms of reforms on vote buying and the crackdown on so-called black-gold politics, but Chen needs a more impressive track record than that to improve his approval ratings.
He should focus on specific issues such as school discipline, women's rights, social welfare, and health care. At the same time, he should act to reform the education system, cut the growth of crime, restore discipline to the schools, protect the environment, improve health care, and provide good housing. Voters are in desperate need in these areas and if Chen and the DPP lead with these issues, they will expand their support base and create a favorable environment for Chen's re-election.
But the mere fact that Chen faces tremendous difficulties does not mean that the Lien-Soong ticket is a certain winner.
Long perceived as a stiff and moderate politician, Lien desperately needs to rebuild his personal image. Lien's biggest problem comes with the joint ticket itself, namely, "the Soong effect." The intensity of their past rivalry highlights the inherent instability of the KMT-PFP alliance. Is Soong really willing to be Lien's subordinate next year? Will his supporters accept Soong's position as the No. 2 of the pan-blue camp? And the KMT and the PFP have raised each other's suspicions about corrupt pasts.
During the 2000 presidential election campaign, the KMT filed a lawsuit against Soong, accusing him of embezzling large sums from party coffers during his tenure as the party's secretary-general.
The move hit the Soong camp so hard that it was considered a major factor in his defeat. The main reason for that defeat lay in Soong's failure to provide voters with a timely and clear refutation. In other words, in an extremely competitive campaign, any mishandling of negative accusations leads to disaster.
The same goes for the newly conjoined Lien-Soong ticket. One of its weaknesses will be the pair's need to distance themselves from their ugly past.
Both Lien and Soong should pledge to voters that their electoral collaboration amounts neither to a resurgence of black-gold politics, nor to a deal done in backroom horse-trading.
To prove that their joint ticket is not just a marriage of convenience or simply for the sake of defeating Chen, both must turn their weaknesses into strengths by convincing voters that they can do a better job than the DPP.
Liu Kuan-teh is a political commentator based in Taipei.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under