In response to the DPP's demand that its lawmakers relinquish their posts in media organizations, the heads of the Northern Taiwan Society, the Central Taiwan Society and the Southern Taiwan Society suggested that media reform should go beyond removing party, political and military influences from terrestrial TV stations. They also argued that all-round complementary measures should be drawn up.
It must be pointed out that the media play an important role in a democracy and should be society's public instruments, rather than being inappropriately manipulated by political or business forces. Due to historical factors, however, Taiwan's media have long been controlled by political forces and the shadow of such control remains. The call to free the media from political and military influences is timely.
President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) demanded that his party members take the lead in stepping out of the media. His request might be criticized within the party as draconian or be interpreted as pandering to the public.
However, with this action as a model, people and the groups advocating social reform can therefore demand that other political parties or politicians follow suit. The KMT should also completely retreat from media operation, instead of continuing to control the media under the pretext that it has placed party assets in trust.
More importantly, freeing the media from political and military influences is just a step, not the ultimate goal, in media reform. Taiwan's media have veered toward monopolization, commercialization and an ideology-oriented direction while at the same time they are covetously eyed by China's investors. Under such circumstances, only requiring the withdrawal of political forces and moving the media toward liberalization are insufficient in the process of reform.
The reform must be based on the ideal structure of mass communications in democratic politics. For the sake of the sustainable development of Taiwan's democracy, the media should become neither a propaganda tool for a handful of politicians nor money-making machines for conglomerates. Rather, the media should serve the public and meet the people's needs for information, culture and education.
To put it more concretely, important media resources,?such as radio bandwidths, should be defined in policy-making and legislation as public assets, not in the possession of individuals, political parties or the government. The ownership structure of the media (cable TV channels, radio stations and newspapers, among others) should be diversified, offering all groups opportunities to participate and make their voices heard. The media operation should also be professionalized.
The above-mentioned public communication system aims at realizing the values of democracy, openness and pluralism.
In the long term, media literacy education should be promoted and people should be provided with mechanisms to balance and criticize the media.The social groups and individuals concerned about Taiwan should identify with these values and help establish the system.
Lin Lih-yun is an assistant professor in the department of journalism and communication studies at Fu Jen Catholic University.
Translated by Jackie Lin
Congressman Mike Gallagher (R-WI) and Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL) led a bipartisan delegation to Taiwan in late February. During their various meetings with Taiwan’s leaders, this delegation never missed an opportunity to emphasize the strength of their cross-party consensus on issues relating to Taiwan and China. Gallagher and Krishnamoorthi are leaders of the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party. Their instruction upon taking the reins of the committee was to preserve China issues as a last bastion of bipartisanship in an otherwise deeply divided Washington. They have largely upheld their pledge. But in doing so, they have performed the
It is well known that Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) ambition is to rejuvenate the Chinese nation by unification of Taiwan, either peacefully or by force. The peaceful option has virtually gone out of the window with the last presidential elections in Taiwan. Taiwanese, especially the youth, are resolved not to be part of China. With time, this resolve has grown politically stronger. It leaves China with reunification by force as the default option. Everyone tells me how and when mighty China would invade and overpower tiny Taiwan. However, I have rarely been told that Taiwan could be defended to
It should have been Maestro’s night. It is hard to envision a film more Oscar-friendly than Bradley Cooper’s exploration of the life and loves of famed conductor and composer Leonard Bernstein. It was a prestige biopic, a longtime route to acting trophies and more (see Darkest Hour, Lincoln, and Milk). The film was a music biopic, a subgenre with an even richer history of award-winning films such as Ray, Walk the Line and Bohemian Rhapsody. What is more, it was the passion project of cowriter, producer, director and actor Bradley Cooper. That is the kind of multitasking -for-his-art overachievement that Oscar
Chinese villages are being built in the disputed zone between Bhutan and China. Last month, Chinese settlers, holding photographs of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), moved into their new homes on land that was not Xi’s to give. These residents are part of the Chinese government’s resettlement program, relocating Tibetan families into the territory China claims. China shares land borders with 15 countries and sea borders with eight, and is involved in many disputes. Land disputes include the ones with Bhutan (Doklam plateau), India (Arunachal Pradesh, Aksai Chin) and Nepal (near Dolakha and Solukhumbu districts). Maritime disputes in the South China