The Presidential Office on Jan. 21 carried out a minor personnel reshuffle -- which has let to a great deal of criticism from the KMT, the PFP and some media organizations. They blame primarily President Chen Shui-bian (
But they have forgotten that they are promoting cooperation between KMT Chairman Lien Chan (
There was nothing inappropriate with the new appointments, each of who is very qualified for their positions. If we want to criticize the matter objectively, the problem lies in the president's decisions that distorted the government system.
First, it should not be within the president's authority to change a vice minister of national defense. Chen's decision to replace former vice minister of national defense Kang Ning-hsiang (
Former president Lee Teng-hui's (李登輝) method of taking charge of Taiwan's defense, diplomatic and cross-strait affairs in person was absolutely groundless. The Ministry of National Defense (MND), the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA), and the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) are all government agencies under the Cabinet. It's indeed a mistake for the Presidential Office to directly rule the MND like this. Under such circumstances, the status and power of the Cabinet have declined bit by bit.
The thinking behind the reshuffle was essentially correct. Former secretary-general to the President Chen Shih-meng (陳師孟) is honest and frank. He strove to consolidate the DPP government's leadership which conflicts and controversy. He is not the ideal choice for the presidential secretary-general, and it's appropriate for the experienced and diplomatic National Security Council (NSC) Secretary-General Chiou I-jen (邱義仁) to succeed the post. It's also suitable for Chen Shih-meng, a scholar at heart, to take the helm of the DPP's planned Ketagalan Academy (凱達格蘭學院). But the KMT and the PFP naturally have linked Chiou with the next year's election due to his background as the President Chen's campaign manager in 2000.
After Chen Shih-meng was suddenly transferred, however, President Chen immediately rewarded him with the high position of a "salaried senior presidential advisor." This decision was the biggest flaw in the personnel reshuffle, and it also violated the principle of "separation of party and government."
President Chen's announcement amounted to an inappropriate political reward that seriously offset an important balance of power. If a salaried senior presidential advisor holds a concurrent post as the head of the DPP's Ketagalan Academy, it's just like paying the president of the ruling party's school with the government's money. This is wrong, plain and simple
Fortunately, Chen Shih-meng firmly turned down the offer and chose not to accept the position. His decision deserves praise. According to the news reports, nevertheless, the president seems to believe that there's nothing wrong for a salaried senior presidential advisor to serve concurrently as the president of the DPP's school. Such thinking is quite bewildering and regrettable.
The Presidential Office spends NT$160 million on advisors. In light of the their work load, the advisors and the president should reconsider this expense. They should take their jobs seriously and earn their wages.
Chiu Hei-yuan is a research fellow in the Institute of Sociology at the Academia Sinica.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Ursula K. le Guin in The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas proposed a thought experiment of a utopian city whose existence depended on one child held captive in a dungeon. When taken to extremes, Le Guin suggests, utilitarian logic violates some of our deepest moral intuitions. Even the greatest social goods — peace, harmony and prosperity — are not worth the sacrifice of an innocent person. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), since leaving office, has lived an odyssey that has brought him to lows like Le Guin’s dungeon. From late 2008 to 2015 he was imprisoned, much of this