My friend Boris was leaving my house drunk. So I suggested that he not drive. He asked why. "You are under the influence," I said. "Aren't you afraid of the police?" "No," Boris replied, "I have a document with Benjamin Franklin's face on it. This always helps me." He showed me his driver's license with a $100-dollar bill tucked beside it.
Obviously, I knew that the police take bribes, but was concerned that Boris might bump into one who wasn't corrupt. "No way," argued Boris. "To be a traffic policeman you must pay off your boss. If you don't take bribes, how can you pay off the boss? Half of Moscow's drivers use licenses bought illegally. Idiots who try to do things honestly drown in bureaucratic minutia. Pay US$100 bucks and you can drive around with no brakes!"
ILLUSTRATION: MOUNTAIN PEOPLE
Bribery and embezzlement have always existed in Russia, before Lenin's October Revolution and after. But never at so titanic a level as today. Bribes are taken by everyone, everywhere, and for everything. Only those not offered bribes, said Boris, don't take them.
Bribery flourishes in most institutions, and the fight against it always ends in disaster or surrender. Police, prosecutors and customs officials, even the Kremlin -- no one and nothing is immune.
Recently, I visited a dacha village in one of Moscow's prettiest suburbs. It was luxurious, but similar to a gulag with its high perimeter fences and guards. Examining the pretentious homes so tastelessly decorated, I asked who owned them and was told that one house was that of a deputy mayor of Moscow, another housed a famous singer, another the son of the Moscow prosecutor. But the most eye-catching estate belonged to a modest officer from the tax services.
Corruption now threatens Russia more than the war in Chechnya. In fact, the Chechen war would not have lasted as long as it has if it weren't for corrupt generals, officers, clerks and policemen who sell weapons and supplies to the rebels.
Russian TV recently showed a bus shuttling from Grozny to Moscow, the very bus that brought to Moscow the 120kg of explosives used in the siege of the Dubrovka theater where so many died in the attempt to rescue the hostages. A female bus passenger kept the explosives covered with an acid-dipped cloth to prevent inspection sniffing dogs from sensing it.
An unnecessary precaution. No one checks buses nowadays. The driver, who didn't know what he was carrying, said that he was stopped 50 times on the journey. But it was always the same. A policeman would ask, "Do you know the price?" "Sure I do," the driver would reply, pay the bribe, and go on. Without the bribe, the bus would have been delayed for hours at each stop, days for the whole journey.
The Chechen War goes on and on not only because the Chechen rebels have al-Qaeda and the whole `Terrorist International' as allies, but because they have an ally in Russian corruption. Policemen, military and civil bribe-takers and thieves, who first tax the Chechen civilians or simply steal from them, sell arms and explosives to the terrorists, reveal military maps of mine fields and supply the rebels with fake documents. In May this year during the Kaspiisk city explosion terrorists used arms that were purchased from Russian Army officers.
The rebels have modern weapons. From where? In the mountains, where the rebels hide, there are no gun-shops. But the 80,000 Russian soldiers opposing the rebels do have ammunition warehouses, from which arms are stolen and sold. Not only arms -- some junior officers sell their own men into slavery.
Russian corruption has reached catastrophic levels, yet no serious fight has been launched against it. Harsher punishment for bribery? This merely brings higher priced bribes. The harsher the punishment, the more you pay to avoid it.
No official wants to fight corruption because they are themselves corrupt. So the so-called `simple people' look at this phenomenon with understanding. They say of their mayor, "Sure he steals, but look how much he has done for the city!
Ordinary people also dislike honest workers. Why? A train ticket costs 100 rubles. But if you pay a small bribe, you travel for 50 rubles. Both passenger and conductor profit. One honest babushka once told me that she bought a ticket and tried to board the train. The conductor stopped her, saying that ticketed passengers were not allowed on the train!
For millions of Russians corruption is the normal way of life. If you don't want your son drafted into the army, pay off a military registrar and he will cross your son's name off the list or bribe a doctor to file an "unfit for military duty" certificate. For a price you can get into any college, no matter your credentials. You can drive drunk, speed, ignore red lights -- provided Ben Franklin is there to be given to the police.
Alexander Menshikov, Peter the Great's minister, understood the impossibility of winning the fight against corruption. When Tsar Peter, sickened by Russia's corruption, decided to hang his bribery-taking officials, Menshikov said, "Your Majesty, you risk losing all your subjects."
In the centuries since then, the situation has become ever more grim. Uprooting corruption may leave a state without subjects. But if we don't stop the march of corruption, the subjects will soon be left without a state.
Vladimir Voinovich, the author of The Life and Adventures of Ivan Chonkin is one of Russia's most acclaimed novelists.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with