Following investigations by the Executive Yuan's Fair Trade Commission (FTC) into Microsoft's monopoly, Microsoft has finally made a show of goodwill and proposed an administrative settlement. However, a larger and more vicious monopoly silently operates within the nation's universities and academic research institutions. It erodes their research capacity and suffocates the development of the national knowledge economy.
This monopoly is run by the publishers and representatives of printed and electronic foreign-language journals. Their annual price hikes are getting out of control. In the past, prices have at the most increased by 10 percent or so per year, something that we all have accepted.
This year, both printed and electronic journals again have seen unreasonable price increases and electronic journals have generally made a complimentary subscription to a printed journal a condition for subscription to that journal. Such ill-willed business methods are something that the FTC should investigate to find out if profiteering or illegal behavior is involved.
If Microsoft's software becomes too expensive, we can at least choose software from another company, but publishers and representatives of journals rely on being the only choice. In addition, the state and universities these days pay great attention to research results. Reference materials are necessary to conduct research. Therefore, regardless of the cost, prices still rise on an annual basis.
Who could have guessed that things would get even worse this year? Add to this the fact that the Ministry of Education (MOE) and the National Science Council (NSC) have not taken a strong position. Not only have they been unable to gather the strength of university libraries for joint negotiations with publishers, but they are also doing away with some existing subsidies.
One wonders whether libraries at every university in a place as small as Taiwan, with the convenience of transportation and the Internet, need to subscribe to similar publications. For example, the state could establish one national information center each in the northern, eastern, southern and western areas of Taiwan (or place the responsibility on the library at one institution, since even a single national institution would be sufficient).
All electronic journals could then be subscribed to by these four centers and shared via the Internet with universities and research institutions in the neighboring areas. Publishers will of course be unwilling accept this, but so long as we are united, and the NSC or the MOE handles negotiations, it should be possible to work out a solution satisfactory to both parties.
The NSC's Science and Technology Information Center currently has the Consortium on Core Electronic Resources in Taiwan, which serves some of these functions. They should have a sense of mission to take on this task. In addition, all universities should work together and wait for the result of the NSC's negotiations. They should not rely on their own wealth to rush to sign agreements with publishers and destroy the power of the collective.
If we don't find a solution, publishers may do as they please. The result is certain to be that the nation's universities and institutions for academic research will spend large amounts on overlapping journal subscriptions, or that they will be forced to cut their number of subscriptions to the point where it threatens the standard of their research capacity.
Chang Ruay-shiung is a professor at National Dong Hwa University.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.