The Kaohsiung and Taipei city councils' elections for speakers and deputy speakers proves at least two things: First, that the KMT and the PFP are simply beyond redemption when it comes to black gold ties; Second, that while gaining office is typically the beginning of corruption, for the KMT merely holding on to power -- such as in the Taipei mayoral election -- is sufficient to kick start the process of corruption.
The newly elected speaker of the Kaohsiung City Council, Chu An-hsiung (朱安雄), and deputy speaker Tsai Song-hsiung (蔡松雄) are both notorious independent black gold politicians. Chu, in particular, is also charged with vote buying in the city council election.
Only a few days earlier, both the KMT and the PFP were self-righteously criticizing the DPP's city council caucus for deciding to support Chu for the speakership. But as it turned out, of the 25 votes garnered by Chu, the KMT contributed 10 and the PFP 6. This seems a case-book example of a "successful pan-blue alliance."
Rumors of vote-buying for the speaker and deputy speaker elections in Kaohsiung were circulating long before the elections occurred.
So if the KMT and PFP just couldn't bring themselves to vote for the DPP nominees but were sincere about cutting ties with the likes of Chu and Tsai, why didn't they nominate their own candidates? Although blue-camp nominees wouldn't win, that would at least keep pan-blue votes from flowing to Chu and Tsai. Instead, the two parties let their council members decide on their own.
Wehter the conduct of the KMT and PFP in this regard was intentional or not, they have proven their lack of determination and inability to severe ties with black gold.
If it was unintentional, it was probably because all the big shots in both parties were too busy bickering over which would be a better pan-blue presidential ticket -- Lien-Soong, Soong-Lien, or whatever.
If it was intentional, the pan-blue camp probably hoped to elect a speaker and deputy speaker in Kaohsiung who would be able back the pan-blue ticket in the presidential election. So the KMT and PFP chose to make a pact with the devil.
On the part of the DPP, it made a satisfactory save. But, it hardly deserves a pat on the back. It should thank its lucky stars that the party central still had enough sense left to go all out in breaking the alliance with Chu.
Reportedly, President Chen Shui-bian
DPP Secretary-General Chang Chun-hsiung
As for the elections in the Taipei City Council, KMT lawmaker Wu Bi-chu (
All this demonstrates that the biggest problem with Taiwan's political parties -- in particular those in the pan-blue camp -- is this obsession over winning "seats" and "offices," rather than doing the right thing. The politicians should remember that they cannot always count on the voters' forgetfulness to save them from their own obsessions.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.