Seeing the triumphant and high-spirited KMT Chairman Lien Chan (
On the one hand, he completely ignored his political friends and allies. He spoke as if the PFP was the KMT's subordinate party devoid of any autonomy. He spoke as if the PFP must do whatever the KMT says in their proposed joint campaign in the 2004 presidential elections.
On the other hand, he no doubt demonstrated his overriding authority as the party chairman. There is no such thing as a "democratic process" within the party. Whether a KMT-KMT ticket -- in which both the presidential and vice presidential candidates are KMT members -- will be an option will be up to Lien alone. Not a word of objection will be uttered in the party.
But is this the real situation? Or is it some sort of "atmosphere" created by Lien in the media? Does the whole pan-blue camp really look up to Lien?
Is Lien the only person calling the shots within the KMT? If things were really under Lien's control as they seem to be, then fielding a pan-blue joint ticket would be as easy as a walk in the park. Why would the party need to wait until the Lunar New Year as Lien said?
Whether the PFP would be willing to put the fate of its chairman and the party itself in Lien's hands is questionable. Following Lien's interviews with the local media, PFP Vice Chairman Chang Chao-hsiung (
Continuing with his tune of suppressing the KMT and lifting the PFP, Chang stressed the importance of a candidate's "personality" and of "recommending a joint presidential candidate who has ability and resolve." Speaking of ability and resolve, one would hardly think of Lien Chan.
The PFP wouldn't play second fiddle to the KMT, and a KMT-PFP ticket seems to be Lien's wishful thinking. Then what about the KMT-KMT ticket that Lien has ruled out?
Taichung City Mayor Jason Hu (
If this is true, then Lien's position and authority in the KMT could be vulnerable. Lien's clique may have a firm grip on the party headquarters now, but the most ruthless and merciless power struggles often come from within.
From the outside, the PFP seems ready to take the reins anytime. From the inside, the younger generation of party elite do not shy away from their leadership ambitions. Even a master of political maneuvers might not survive such a difficult battle, much less Lien, who has suffered a string of political setbacks.
So is the present situation like the calm before the storm? The answer to this question is not as easy as setting off firecrackers during the Lunar New Year holidays.
Chin Heng-wei is editor-in-chief of Contemporary Monthly magazine.
Translated by Wu Pei-shih
Burger King Taiwan on Wednesday last week posted an update on Facebook advertising a new “Wuhan pneumonia” (武漢肺炎) home delivery meal, catering to customers hankering for a Whopper, but who wished to avoid visiting one of its outlets. “Wuhan pneumonia” is the term commonly used in Taiwan to describe COVID-19. Beijing has been waging an extensive propaganda campaign against the use of the words “Wuhan” or “China” in reference to the novel coronavirus, calling it racist and discriminatory. Meanwhile, Chinese officials have claimed that the coronavirus might have originated in the US. The intention is obvious: to distract attention from the Chinese Communist
Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Air Force Shaanxi KJ-500 airborne early-warning aircraft and Shenyang J-11 fighters on March 16 conducted a nighttime exercise in the waters southwest of Taiwan and, in doing so, came close to the nation’s air defense identification zone. Three days later, the PLA Navy’s fleet for Gulf of Aden escort mission sailed north in the Pacific off Taiwan’s east coast via the Miyako Strait on its way home. Meanwhile, the US carried out freedom of navigation operations in the South China Sea and assembled the USS Theodore Roosevelt carrier strike group with the Expeditionary Strike Group to conduct
Italy, Spain, France, the UK and the US are all depending on social distancing to fight COVID-19 and have fallen into terrible situations, with mounting positive cases and many deaths. Social distancing might flatten the curve, so that the peak is not so high that hospitals are overwhelmed with patients, the problem is that the pandemic could extend further into the future, hurt the economy more and become unbearable for society. Taiwan, South Korea, Japan and Singapore have controlled the spread of COVID-19, and the main reason is that most Asians wear masks. It can be illustrated as follows: If someone contracts the
Having returned to the UK late last year and with a Taiwanese spouse remaining in Taiwan, I have been afforded the chance to compare and contrast the UK and Taiwanese governments’ responses to the COVID-19 crisis. My early conclusions are that Taiwan benefits from a rational, competent government, which quickly recognizes, adapts to and confronts large-scale disasters. It is led by a government that does more than just talk of respecting democracy and human rights, one that is scrutinized and responds to criticism, one that is concerned about public opinion, and one that is used to dealing with emergencies on