It's ironic isn't it that one of the criticisms usually made of Americans and their culture is that there is almost no historical memory. The US is, so the conventional wisdom goes, a country populated by people escaping the burden of history, and indeed from a European perspective American understanding of how things became the way they are -- and that is what history is all about -- always seems a little scant. And yet recent events have shown Americans to have the historical grasp of a Gibbon or a Thucydides compare with Taiwanese. If their is any nation of which it can be said that its people are historical amnesiacs it is this one.
\nConsider for example former Senate majority leader Trent Lott -- number three in People magazine's list of "losers of the year," by the way. At the 100th birthday of Strom Thurmond, senator for South Carolina, Lott remarked that had Thurmond won his election bid in 1948, the US would not have many of the problems that it faced today. The problem with Thurmond's "Dixiecrat"campaign was that it was almost entirely on the basis of continued racial segregation. Americans showed, quite admirably, that they were ashamed of this part of their past, and disgusted with Lott for appearing to speak well of it. Even President George W. Bush took the highly unusual step of delivering a public rebuke to Lott. The senator, unsurprisingly, lost his leadership position, and is probably condemned permanently to the political wilderness.
\nAn interesting and salutary story of someone identifying with a past disgrace and paying the penalty for it. It's not that unusual in Europe of course where the specter of Nazism, fascism and communism has taught that continent to be very careful how it speaks about the good old days. Contrast this with Taiwan. Recently KMT Chairman Lien Chan (連戰) went on the record saying that he wished to "sever his ties" with the 12 years that Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) was head of the party. This might seem innocent enough at face value -- the current leader doesn't think his predecessor did a good job -- but it is a faux pas as serious as Lott's and it is only because Taiwanese are the world's real historical amnesiacs that Lien can get away with it. For what this comment amounts to is a repudiation of all Taiwan's democratic development since the lifting of martial law.
\nDuring the 12 years Lee led the party, he pushed it, much against the will of the many in the party who were loath to give up their privileges, into democratization. Under Lee we saw the dissolution of the National Assembly and Legislative Yuan -- frozen in place since 1948 on the absurd principle that they could not be re-elected until elections could be held in China -- and their replacement by representative elected institutions. We saw democratic elections instituted for Taipei and Kaohsiung City mayors and eventually, after a huge fight against reactionary elements in the KMT for the presidency. At least as importantly, the Lee era saw the abandonment of imprisonment or exile for political reasons and a huge improvement in human rights.
\nLien Chan doesn't like this, apparently. What he must prefer, and we would like to question him about this, is a Taiwan without democracy, with the black list, with political prisoners, perhaps even with the Taiwan Garrison Command and the assassinations that were a feature of Taiwanese political life well into the mid-1980s.
\nFrankly, Lien's rancid sentiments, with their nostalgia for the days of Chiang (
Having returned to the UK late last year and with a Taiwanese spouse remaining in Taiwan, I have been afforded the chance to compare and contrast the UK and Taiwanese governments’ responses to the COVID-19 crisis. My early conclusions are that Taiwan benefits from a rational, competent government, which quickly recognizes, adapts to and confronts large-scale disasters. It is led by a government that does more than just talk of respecting democracy and human rights, one that is scrutinized and responds to criticism, one that is concerned about public opinion, and one that is used to dealing with emergencies on
The “Wuhan pneumonia” outbreak has become a pandemic, but many countries have yet to come to grips with the worsening severity of this medical crisis. Historian Robert Peckham has studied how the ecology of deadly diseases has changed from the late 19th century until today and, in his 2016 book titled Epidemics in Modern Asia highlights the intrinsic link between global connectivity and emerging infections. The frequency of outbreaks — from SARS in 2003 to swine flu in 2009 and today’s COVID-19 — and their rapid rate of transmission owe much to globalization. Better and cheaper transportation and communications technology have empowered
Early last month, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Johnny Chiang (江啟臣) was elected party chairman, winning with a seven-to-three majority over pro-Beijing former Taipei mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌), a two-time KMT vice chairman. Chiang’s victory has been interpreted as a generational change and the beginning of major party reform. In his inauguration speech on March 9, Chiang did not mention the so-called “1992 consensus.” Analysts believe that his most urgent task is to attract more young people to the party and win voter trust, and that he does not care about Beijing’s reaction. After joining the party chairmanship by-election, Chiang made his