Every year The Nobel prizes are been awarded in Oslo and Stockholm. Instituted more than a hundred years ago by Alfred Nobel, a manufacturer of weapons and explosives, they reflect the remorse he felt about making a fortune from the sale of dynamite and weapons. He established a fund which, ever since his death in 1901, has been used to award annual prizes to people or institutions for their contribution to society. They focus on the future, rewarding high ideals and progress, rather than cynicism and destruction.
The Nobel Prizes were the first international awards for achievements in physics, chemistry, medicine, literature and peace. One addition has been made. In 1968 the Sveriges Riksbank (Bank of Sweden) endowed the "Prize in Economic Sciences in memory of Alfred Nobel." Since then, nothing has changed. In our view, the time has come for the next visionary step -- the endowment of a prize for sustainable development.
The world has undergone considerable changes since the 1960s. Concern about the darker side of mass consumption and the use of fossil fuels has grown since the Club of Rome published its reports on global environmental pollution in the early 1970s. Economic development has affected our environment and generated huge differences in global prosperity. It is imperative that a close watch is kept on the balance between economy, the environment and development. In 1987 the former prime minister of Norway, Ms Bruntlandt, wrote her famous report, Our common future. In this she coined the phrase "sustainable development" and explained the relationship between development and the environment, describing it as, "a development that meets the needs of the present, without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs."
To put it simply, sustainability means taking account of human society and the environment, now and later, here and elsewhere. The Bruntlandt report was followed by two world conferences in Rio de Janeiro in 1992 and in Johannesburg this year to consider the issues of poverty, development and the environment. The importance of human and environmentally friendly actions has been recognized at the highest level. Climate change, desertification, the lack of clean water and the loss of biodiversity are already endangering the earth. The depletion of our natural resources, global warming and the loss of biodiversity now matches concerns about war and disease.
Sustainable development has become an increasingly familiar term, but familiarity does not necessarily mean that anything is also actually done to address it. The topic generates a greater amount of paper than the number of successful examples of countries, businesses or projects that can show to have adopted practical approaches to putting it into effect. It is time now to found a Nobel Prize for sustainable development to celebrate those who give more than lip service to the issue and actually do something about it. Not defeatism, but innovation, technological advances and responsibility should be rewarded. The prize should be open to the business community as well as scientists, politicians, social organizations and ordinary people. Technological breakthroughs and changes in consumer behavior are essential to the earth's future, and without the leadership of the business community this will be impossible to achieve. Socially responsible entrepreneurship and moral leadership must become the characteristics of corporate business.
A Nobel Prize for sustainable development would give a boost to social and environmentally friendly development. Prize winners can expect a degree of fame and status which can help them promote their views. Sometimes a Nobel Prize can also provide a shield of protection and immunity. Repressive governments have been embarrassed by the attention shown to winners such as the Dalai Lama (Tibet) and Aung San Suu Kyi (Burma). A prize for sustainable development may give a new incentive to world leaders to support innovative projects and respect international treaties.
In March 2003 we will be writing formally to ask the Nobel Foundation in Stockholm to consider a Nobel Prize for Sustainable Development. Citizens, businesses, organizations and politicians all over the world are invited to add their name to the letter via www.sustainable-prize.net.
James Greenwood is a member of the US Congress, Chris Davies is a British member of the European Parliament, Ingrid Aaldijk is a former UN Youth representative and Boris van der Ham is a member of parliament in The Netherlands.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs