The incident in which Taiwan's first lady, Wu Shu-chen (
Reports in the media focused solely on the damage done to the nation's dignity. Apart from highlighting its principles and determination to uphold those principles, they completely neglected the important lesson of this incident for all people seeking freedom of movement in the abnormal state of affairs that is the "war on terror."
Wu's security check was not an isolated incident. Rather, it was the product of a new US national security policy developed since the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks. The US government is practicing population control in the name of national security. The question of who these controls are aimed at often involves the problem of defining "outsider" status. Indeed, in today's highly mobile and unstable society, it is very difficult to identify precisely who is an "outsider." Working definitions seem to hover around various markers of status in society, such as class, race, gender and citizenship.
Undeniably, some of these markers are more likely to attract the attention of national security organs than others. As everyone knows, since Sept. 11 anyone of Middle Eastern background has had a much greater chance of being subjected to a security check, regardless of whether or not he has US citizenship.
Interestingly, in response to the US war on terror, Taiwan's government has adopted the same tactics, in other words mobilizing the national security system to monitor "suspicious" foreigners, especially Middle Easterners. (Looked at from this angle, a series of recent government measures relating to status and national security -- including the handling of Chinese brides, immigrants to Matsu and Taiwanese residing in China -- are all actually bolstering the logic of "anti-terrorism," a fact which certainly deserves to be discussed more widely.)
No doubt with US encouragement, similar measures for monitoring Middle Easterners have already quietly become informal guidelines for the security agencies in many countries, even to the extent of becoming the primary object of international police cooperation.
Equating "status" and "national security" in this way on the international level and making a particular social status the rationale for police monitoring, thereby affecting the activities, property and privacy of a particular group, smacks of a kind of racial "solution" taking shape on a global scale. Viewed from this angle, the incident of the first lady being subjected to a security check in the US is merely one part of a larger pattern. No wonder the US is unhappy with the media (and the ruling DPP) for publicizing the incident.
To consolidate a sense of national identity, the authorities have actively emulated US anti-terrorist measures, increasing their controls over the activities of "outsiders" of all sorts (naturally including foreigners and Chinese nationals who collectively make up four percent of the population) and even adopting US methods of racial profiling.
They have no grounds to complain about US high-handedness. What Taiwan really needs is to come up with alternatives to a "conspiracy between nations."
Jon Solomon is an assistant professor in the Program in Futures Studies at Tamkang University
Translated by Ethan Harkness
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Ursula K. le Guin in The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas proposed a thought experiment of a utopian city whose existence depended on one child held captive in a dungeon. When taken to extremes, Le Guin suggests, utilitarian logic violates some of our deepest moral intuitions. Even the greatest social goods — peace, harmony and prosperity — are not worth the sacrifice of an innocent person. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), since leaving office, has lived an odyssey that has brought him to lows like Le Guin’s dungeon. From late 2008 to 2015 he was imprisoned, much of this