Amid much attention and not a little doubt at home and abroad, the nine members of the Fair Trade Commission (FTC) agreed unanimously to accept Microsoft Corporation's request for an administrative settlement to the dispute over its allegedly unfair trade practices in Taiwan after four hours of debate on Oct. 31.
I have misgivings about the appropriateness of the FTC negotiating an administrative settlement in the political and economic atmosphere generated by the US software giant's various moves. Will the FTC be able to stick independently and calmly to its important role as maintainer of market competition mechanisms in the settlement process? I also worry whether the FTC will get bitten when "asking the tiger for its skin" (
My worries are not groundless. The FTC should seriously consider these criticisms and act to dispel public doubts. These doubts arise partly from unfamiliarity with the administrative settlement system, as many are afraid that Taiwan may sign an unfair settlement. In fact, an administrative settlement is considered a kind of administrative contract, officially recognized by the Administrative Procedure Law (
I hope that the FTC is taking the right course. However, as far as the commission's three-point statement is concerned I don't see any fact or legal relation that is "impossible to ascertain through investigation." If the FTC doesn't clarify its decision and reaches the settlement recklessly, it will be laughed at for currying favor with Microsoft while putting Taiwan's administrative laws aside. That being so, is the government a winner or a loser if it wins the settlement by abusing the administrative laws?
We have to note that the FTC and much of public opinion seem to have placed particular stress on the direct interests of consumers once Microsoft lowers its software prices. The control of such "monopolistic prices" is highly controversial in the making of competition policy the world over.
The US Antitrust Law doesn't place restrictions on high prices since the law is based on the premise that high prices can attract competition.
Although monopolistic prices have been regulated in the EU and Taiwan, which place greater value on the short-term interests of customers, there have not been too many instances in which this has been a success.
The FTC should play the dual role of both maintainer and promoter of competition, instead of that of constant controller of market prices. As it negotiates the settlement, the FTC should break Microsoft's monopoly in our software market, bring in the software company's international competitors and, most importantly, enhance the competitiveness of Taiwan's software industry.
In so doing, it will be exercising its full role and powers. After all, it is market competition, not just one or two price cuts, that will best protect consumers' interests. For the sake of the ultimate interests of the public, the FTC must promote market competition.
Wu Shiow-ming is an associate professor of law at National Chengchi University
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry