The Fair Trade Commission (FTC) announced on Thursday its acceptance of a request by Microsoft for an administrative settlement of an investigation into its alleged unfair trade practices. While the settlement attempt, if successful, would mark only the fifth such administrative settlement in the commission's 10-year history, countries such as the US have long resorted to such measures in their efforts to curb illegal monopolistic trade practices. Therefore, the decision to pursue such a remedy here does not deserve the level of attack it has been subjected to, nor is it fair for opposition lawmakers to threaten to axe the commission's budget.
In the US, a federal district court is scheduled to announce its decision on an anti-trust settlement between Microsoft and the federal government. The settlement is to be made binding by the court, because nine of the 18 states that originally filed the lawsuit have refused to accept the terms of the settlement. This group wants more out of Microsoft. In the US case the parties may disagree over the contents of the settlement, but the general consensus is still to settle the matter. This all could be seen as a process through which everybody searches for settlement terms that are acceptable to all parties involved.
While the FTC may have agreed to attempt a settlement with Microsoft, it is too early to say whether any settlement will materialize. The commission has given the company 30 days to submit a settlement proposal. If the commission finds the terms of the proposal unacceptable it could turn it down and proceed to fine Microsoft. In other words, the two sides have barely started the search for a workable solution.
The FTC has three options in cases of alleged violations of the Fair Trade Law (
This is different from US law, under which the federal government can still reach a settlement where violations can be established. In practice, as indicated by the Microsoft case in which prior courts had already found the company in violation of the anti-trust law, settlements are often a preferred remedy, especially in cases where the alleged monopolistic behaviors are not only extensive but have become deeply entrenched in the system. This is because the federal government can better draft and tailor the settlement terms to restore the market mechanism to normality without killing off the business or industry entirely.
In Taiwan, to reach a settlement under which the FTC can both participate and oversee the correction of a twisted market mechanism would also seem to be a preferred option to simply fining Microsoft. After all, Microsoft can surely afford a fine, no matter the cost. A prime reason that the company is willing to settle the case is because it does not want to tarnish its reputation by being hit with fines, not to mention what it may do for the many lawsuits the company is currently facing in other countries.
It too early to crucify and nail the FTC. Give the commission a chance to show what it can do.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry