Print

Mail

wiki links

More pragmatic Taiwan-EU links

Attitudes in the media toward the European Parliament's recent Taiwan-friendly resolutions have been varied. The positive opinion is that the parliament is a crucial international organization and the resolutions mark another diplomatic victory for Taipei. The negative view is that the resolutions are a result of efforts by Taiwan to collude with, even to buy off, members of the parliament, and that the parliament is, in any case, only a sideshow in European politics. I don't fully agree with either view.

First, it is not fair to say that the resolutions were the result of an attempt to buy off members of parliament. Jules Maaten, who advanced one of the proposals, is a member of the European Liberal Democrats, a party on the political right but the economic left. The party is anti-authoritarianism and pro-democracy and views opposition to regimes that disregard human rights, such as China and Egypt, as integral to its mission. A firm supporter of Taiwan's democratization, the party is itself a rare phenomenon at a time when China fever is sweeping the globe. There is no need for Taiwan to collude with, not to mention bribe, this party.

However, it is only partially correct to say that the European Parliament is a key international organization. Power restructuring in the arena of public affairs is the most complex aspect of European integration. The reason the pro-Taiwan resolutions have only limited influence is because EU states are unwilling to transfer authority over national defense and diplomacy to the Union. But that does not mean the parliament is completely powerless. It enjoys a high level of authority.

Two years ago, for instance, the Dutch government failed to support its regional administrations in applications for EU subsidies. The regional administrations then turned to Brussels and successfully lobbied the parliament and the European Commission to reverse the Dutch government's policy. During the process, the regional administrations established their own office in Brussels, enabling them to challenge the might of their government's office at the EU. The targets of their lobbying efforts were members of parliament.

This also highlights the fact that Taiwan, in its observation of the EU, has overlooked the fact that power in many areas has moved away from the member states' central governments and toward their regional governments during the process of European integration.

Germany's Ministry of Foreign Affairs insisted more than a decade ago that EU affairs fell within the jurisdiction of the central government and that local administrations should not interfere in them. But the ministry had to give ground after all of Germany's state governments established their own offices in Brussels to conduct lobbying. An amendment to Article 23 of Germany's Constitution stipulated that whether to participate in EU affairs is a matter for each Ger-man state to decide. Similar developments followed in Italy, Finland and Spain.

Relations with China are a case in point. Although EU members refuse to transfer this diplomatic issue to lower levels of government, some EU regional governments have been conducting exchanges with provincial or local governments in China for some time -- for example Essex County in Britain with Jiangsu Province and Emilia-Romagna Province in Italy with Tianjin.

What's important is that these exchanges are backed by the European Commission. The most important proof of this was the appointment last month of Isabelle Jagiello as its representative to China. She was brought over from the Local Government International Bureau, the European and international arm of the Local Government Association for England and Wales.

In other words, international affairs not only fall within the jurisdiction of the parliament but also within the purview of regional governments within EU members. This will have a bearing on the Commission's China strategy in coming years.

The significance of the EU is beyond question. Taiwan is right to seek the support of its friends in the European Parliament, but it can do better in its diplomatic strategies. Taiwan must clearly recognize the realpolitik under which the EU operates. It is futile to waste energy on useless Taiwan-friendly proposals at a time when the parliament has no real diplomatic power. Taiwan should, instead, make pragmatic, long-term investments to strengthen exchanges with parliament members and regional European governments.

Chien Shiuh-shen is a doctoral candidate at the London School of Economics and Political Science.

Translated by Jackie Lin
This story has been viewed 2300 times.