The Executive Yuan yesterday passed a set of legislative amendments canceling tax exemptions for people serving in the military as well as elementary and high school faculty and staff members. At the same time, however, the Executive Yuan also agreed to demands from the Ministry of National Defense and Ministry of Education asking for "salary subsidies" for service members and education-sector workers. The defense ministry wants salary hikes worth an annual NT$5 billion, while the education ministry is seeking an additional NT$10 billion in its budget. Canceling the tax exemptions will increase the government's tax revenues by NT$13 billion, according to estimates by the Ministry of Finance. Approving the ministries' subsidy requests would cost NT$15 billion. Doesn't sound like a good deal for the Executive Yuan.
The tax exemptions for service members and education-sector workers have been in place for several decades. They used to be seen as political tools, but recent changes in Taiwan's political environment have made it impossible to control and use service members and teachers as election pawns. Public awareness of fair taxation is also rising. Public opinion polls have consistently shown more than 80 percent of respondents support ending these exemptions, even a majority of service people and teachers.
But cancelling the exemptions should not be linked to the two ministries' requests for subsidies. Service people and education-sector workers already enjoy higher salaries than most civil servants. The erstwhile reasons for tax exemptions -- low salaries -- no longer exists. According to Central Personnel Administration statistics, the monthly salary of a lieutenant general in the army is NT$3,000 more than an equivalent "Level 13" official in the civil service. Elementary and high school teachers who have taught for 15 years or more get NT$5,000 more per month than other civil servants with the same length of service.
Government finances are in dire straits, with accumulated debts of more than NT$3 trillion. The government's debt load continues to increase each year. The Executive Yuan should not rush to let go of any opportunity to increase tax revenues.
The Cabinet is now asking its agencies not to increase spending unless they can come up with a comparable increase in income. And yet it appears willing to give up the additional tax revenues it would gain from eliminating the exemptions.
Teachers' and servicemembers' organizations are asking for increases in specific areas of their salary structures. The military is asking for more risk compensation and extra pay for being assigned to offshore islands. The education sector wants more extra pay for counseling and guidance work. While adjustments may be needed in some areas, such changes should be determined by the Central Personnel Administration, not linked to tax issues.
The tax exemptions for service people and education-sector workers have long been a headache for the government. The government is facing a situation and conditions that are very different from the past. It should decisively cancel unfair tax exemptions or incentives and delink salary hikes and subsidies from such cancelations.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry