If the Nauru debacle last week proved anything, it is that Taiwan's dollar diplomacy has run its course. Buying the support of impoverished specks on the map with aid and development grants was only feasible as long as there wasn't anybody else with deeper pockets in the market. It made sense, in other words, while China was too poor to do anything about it. That is no longer the case.
Nevertheless, Beijing's leadership is too busy with its game of musical chairs to sanction a pro-active buying spree as official policy. What happened with Nauru was largely a case of reactive opportunism. Nauru had time and again asked Taiwan for money which the government, cash-strapped as it is as a result of swinging cuts in its budget courtesy of the pro-China "pan-blue" camp, couldn't provide. As a result Nauru went to China. This, if anything, is the reason why there will be no domino effect among Taiwan's allies, because China is not on a pro-active buying spree. Some Chinese officials will of course try to earn kudos by provoking a change in relations -- the recent pressure on Panama is an example, in which Panamanian officials were told that further investment by China was unlikely in the absence of formal diplomatic relations. The Panamanians quite rightly judged this to be a low-level provocation rather than a real overture from Beijing, a pitiful attempt to score a diplomatic success on the cheap.
Nevertheless, Taiwan has to take such adventurism seriously, hence Premier Yu Shyi-kun's rushing off to Central America with US$45 million for Panama and US$55 million in largesse for benighted Haiti.
Dollar diplomacy has always been a strategy adopted for lack of any feasible alternative as long as Taiwan's governments have thought it needed "allies" to retain some sort of international legitimacy. There has long seemed to be a fear that lack of formal relations with anyone would consign Taiwan to the status of a breakaway enclave like Transnistria or Abkhazia. This is of course nonsense. Taiwan is not an enclave of gangsters fallen off the disintegrating Soviet empire but an international manufacturing and trading powerhouse. Given the countries with which Taiwan maintains so-called unofficial relations -- more than 60 including the US, Japan and the leading countries of Europe -- it is hard to see what is to be gained by formal relations with Nauru. Some might say that at least the maintenance of formal relations with some nations allows for the internationalization of any potential conflict with China. To which one can only say that if conflict with China is to engage the international community it will be through the concern of the US and Japan, not the formal protests in the UN of Nauru, or any of Taiwan's other allies.
All of which suggest that the direction we see the Presidential Office pursuing -- not, take note, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs -- is the right one. With National Security Council officials doing most of the running, Taiwan has made overtures to both Mongolia and Russia in recent weeks. It is not unlikely that Mongolia might start contributing overseas contract workers to Taiwan in the near future, while the opening of direct air links with Russia to be accomplished later this year will constitute a link with that country of a basic but valuable kind. What is needed is aggressive encouragement of Taiwan's business community to get involved with the Russian market, leading eventually to the opening of trade offices between the two countries. The fact is that, while formal ties with places like Nauru might be an excuse for ostrich feathers and honor guards, Taiwan should be making more informal ties with more powerful countries its priority.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry