Taiwan has probably never seen a ten-fold rise in the price of a basic service during times of peace. But this, shocking as it sounds, is set to happen on Sept. 1. The price in question: the fee payable at the point of treatment under the National Health Insurance program.
Think about it. Just how absurd is a national health insurance system in which, after paying your premiums, you have to pay higher fees for a visit to the hospital than before you were covered by the program? The Bureau of National Health Insurance has said the price hike is intended to improve the program's finances and realize the patient transfer system. It is deceiving itself and deceiving others by claiming this.
If the financial situation of the insurance program is so desperate that only such "exploitation" of the public can prolong its life, then why are employees of the bureau still getting year-end and performance bonuses equivalent to four-and-a-half months of their salaries? Does the performance of the employees have nothing to do with the insurance program losing money? Meanwhile, instead of trying harder to collect the combined NT$30 billion debt owed by Taipei and Kaohsiung cities, the bureau wants to turn its guns on the innocent public and make them the scapegoats. How can this be acceptable to anyone?
Will the price hike, moreover, actually help to bring the patient transfer system into being? Despite its significant number of medical economists, the bureau has come up with a simplistic and extremely crude method of using prices to control volume. The price hike may force some members of the public to visit basic-level clinics instead of hospitals, but I believe a majority of patients will grit their teeth and try to cut other expenses so that they can still go to large hospitals, while at the same time cursing the government for its incompetence. After all, some pleasures can be sacrificed, but we only have one life.
Why does the government keep coming up with stopgap measures for problems facing the health insurance program? Only recently the new "overall payment system" caused two patients to commit suicide because they were not able to register for hospital treatment. Does the bureau want to push more people to death with this price hike? One can only sigh in despair at this government-sanctioned theft.
Gao Jyh-peng is a DPP legislator.
Translated by Francis Huang
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs