When meeting two delegations from Taiwan, Chinese Vice Premier Qian Qichen (錢其琛) said in Beijing on July 5 that the direct links can be promptly established if they are viewed as domestic affairs [by Taipei]. That being so, political disputes over the "one China" principle will not be involved. Meanwhile, when meeting representatives from the Taiwanese political group Mountain, China's Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait (ARATS, 海協會) Chairman Wang Daohan (汪道涵) said in Shanghai on July 7 that Beijing still places its hopes on President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) -- although he found Chen's refusal to admit the "one China" principle hard to understand.
The subtlety of Qian's talk lies in the word "viewed," because the rest of his talk is exactly the same as the so-called "1992 consensus," which also suggests that cross-strait talks on practical matters do not have to involve political issues over the "one China" principle. At the time, both sides of the Taiwan Strait handled the differences by allowing each side to have its own interpretation of the principle. With the word "viewed" added, no written agreement or even interpretation will be necessary. Thus, according to Beijing, it will be acceptable if the cross-strait links are taken as domestic links (by Taipei).
In the view of international precedents on aviation rights, it's only necessary to define what kinds of routes are allowed between two countries or two areas -- in order to describe the status of these routes. There is no need to define whether a transport link is international or domestic. Based on international precedents, in the future, it's only necessary to define which countries' planes will be allowed to fly across the strait. There will be no need to define the transport link as a "cross-strait link," "special cross-strait link," "domestic link" or "special domestic link" in an aviation contract.
If the word "viewed" can be explained like this, it means that Beijing has taken the opening of direct links as a major priority on its Taiwan policy. Beijing has already found a shortcut to achieve this goal, as its unchanged political stance seems to be somewhat flexible at present.
But for such an important political issue, is it best for Taiwan to view direct links as domestic links without any written agreement or interpretation? If the both sides do not raise political issues, they can certainly avoid possible disputes easily. But if one side suggests "viewing" direct links as domestic links while the other side makes no any interpretation, is this a tacit recognition? In fact, this is exactly why the principle of "one China," with each side having its own interpretation" was adopted in 1992.
The Chen administration has repeatedly declared that "the opening of direct links is the path that we must take." But it has refused to accept the "1992 consensus." Now, it must quickly think over the handling of the issue of "viewing the direct links as domestic affairs." Nevertheless, Chen clearly said during his African trip that "it's not acceptable" to view direct links as domestic affairs. Obviously, it seems that all the disputes have returned to their origin in 1992.
Cheng An-kuo is a former vice chairman of the Mainland Affairs Council.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry