Tongyong Pinyin a mistake
The Ministry of Education Man-darin Promotion Council's recent decision to recommend that Taiwan adopt the Tong-yong Pinyin Romanization system over the internationally adopted Hanyu Pinyin system is tragically flawed ("Tongyong Pinyin the new system for Romanization," July 11, page 3). If the council is serious about promoting Man-darin, then they need to consider the following factors and reverse their recommendation.
First, the use of any Romanization system is primarily to benefit foreigners living in Tai-wan. It is inconceivable to think that the opinions of foreign residents, students or professionals were reflected in the council's decision. Rather than be helped by the Tongyong Pinyin system, foreigners will either be further confused, or forced to learn a second Roman-ization system simply to read the street signs.
Second, the decision to recommend Tongyong Pinyin is educationally unsound. Many Mandarin students who, like myself, come to Taiwan to fulfill language requirements for degree programs, are expected to use Hanyu Pinyin in their home universities. It makes no sense to study a textbook in Hanyu Pinyin in the US and then have to learn another system in order to study in Taiwan.
If students who want to study Mandarin encounter these kinds of obstacles when trying to study in Taiwan, they will consider going to China instead.
Such a mass exodus of students would adversely affect the local economy, universities and language centers, and leave many of the private English schools short of native speakers to fill their teaching vacancies. Furthermore, this kind of exo-dus would cripple President Chen Shui-bian's (陳水扁) recent resolve to raise the English level of students and professionals by allowing foreigners to teach English in public schools.
Finally, the adoption of Tongyong Pinyin will not facilitate the linguistic competency of foreigners who need to do business in Taiwan and China. Whether the council likes it or not, foreigners who reside or study Mandarin in Taiwan are not isolated from China.
The recommendation to adopt Tongyong Pinyin is a politically motivated, reactionary and isolationist recommendation that will be counterproductive to many of the government's goals and priorities. For this reason, I urge all concerned parties to contact the council at mandr@mail.moe.gov.tw and register your protest.
Timothy Conkling
Taipei
Regarding the Pinyin issue, consistency is very important. Tai-chung's Wenhsin (Hanyu Pinyin: Wenxin; 文心) Road has at least three spellings, none of which follow any standard of Pinyin I know. These spellings include, but are not limited to: Wen-shin, Wen-sin and Uen-shin.
When consistency can't even be maintained on a single street, it's hard to fathom that Taiwan's politicians could ever make a decision consistent with international standards.
Taiwanese kids don't need Tongyong Pinyin in order to learn how to read, write, or speak Mandarin, Hoklo, Hakka or any of the native languages of Taiwan. In fact, they don't need Pinyin at all if they are taught these languages from childhood. So far, they seem to have done just fine without it.
But most foreigners who visit Taiwan do need Pinyin and it would probably be a good idea to use a form which is already used the world over. If Taiwan-ese people hope to communicate with any of them or to ease the visits of these foreign visitors, I'd recommend Hanyu Pinyin.
If Taiwan insists on remaining separated from the world by its "cultural sovereignty," then go with Tongyong Pinyin and let Yu Bor-chuan (余伯泉) -- whose name I'd never be able to correctly pronounce by looking at the Pinyin spelling -- go down in the history books with the 10 "experts" who made this highly politicized, dreadful decision.
Andrew Hokanson
Taichung
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.