Since President Chen Shui-bian (
The unique merits of successful businesspeople, of course, lie in the realm of commerce. It isn't necessarily in the national interest for them to become involved in political affairs, because, after all, that isn't their area of expertise. Conflicts of interest must also be avoided.
The issue of direct links has been the focus of many people's concern since Chen suggested appointing representatives from the private sector to assist in negotiations with China on the matter. The president opened the door a crack and tycoon Wang Yung-ching (王永慶) immediately jammed his hand in the gap by saying, "Don't be all talk and no action."
At the same time, Beijing also stepped up its efforts. The director of China's Taiwan Affairs Office, Chen Yunlin (陳雲林), issued a statement on May 21 requesting that Taiwan commission business leaders who have been strong advocates of direct links -- including Wang and Kao Ching-yuan (高清愿) -- to discuss the issue with Beijing. Such unusual and abrupt action on Bei-jing's part prompted misgivings in Taiwan.
First, is this a case of Taiwan commissioning representatives of the private sector to hold talks with Beijing, or is it a case of China commissioning Taiwan's private sector? When countries negotiate, each side sends a delegation that best represents its own interests.
Second, Taiwan has, in the Straits Exchange Foundation (SEF), an official delegation with full negotiating powers. It is recognized as such by China and has served as an organ for negotiating with Beijing on matters of a routine nature. China's unilateral refusal to accept the standing and functions of the SEF -- with all the powers vested in it by government -- and its attempt thereby to begin anew is an obvious ploy to create obstacles. Without that ploy, negotiations could have proceeded more quickly.
Important statements made by Chinese officials have sometimes had to be clarified or explained anew by so-called "authorities" at Hong Kong's Wen Wei Bao newspaper after their initial announcements. And sure enough, on May 22, such an authority further elucidated Chen Yunlin's speech in the daily.
In his elaboration, the authority made the following three points -- Chen had not named Wang or Kao specifically as possible representatives in negotiations, so Taiwan's interpretation of the speech had misled the public. China would not require Taiwan's negotiator to state a position on the "1992 consensus." Direct links are a domestic matter.
China's charge that Taiwan's government misled its people is unfounded. Even some legislators from the "pan blue" camp were unable to accept it. The second point would seem to indicate a degree of goodwill. But the third, of course, immediately negates it.
Yu Keli (余克禮), assistant director of the Institute of Taiwan Studies at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, clearly laid down certain preconditions that he said Taiwan's negotiators must meet. He said they must recognize that the two sides of the Strait belong to one country and that direct links are a domestic matter for that country. Yu also said that if the negotiators have been involved with the Taiwan independence movement, China would not accept them as representatives of Taiwan. If Taiwan's repre-sentatives have to be approved by China, doesn't that mean that Beijing is appointing Taiwan's representatives?
Direct links would benefit economic exchanges across the Strait, but they would not be a panacea for Taiwan's economic problems. Hong Kong and China are already "linked" in numerous ways, but the economic climate in Hong Kong is worse than that in Taiwan. An unemployment rate of 7.1 percent is clear proof of this.
More importantly, China's threats to use military force compels Taiwan to consider national security. China's use of direct links to counter and belittle Taiwan's claim to its own sovereignty forces Taipei to proceed very carefully in order to avoid falling into political traps. The capricious and disorganized nature of China's "policy making" requires Taiwan to spend a lot of time on policy analysis.
These are the real reasons why the direct links have not yet been implemented. The responsibility lies with China.
Paul Lin is a political commentator based in New York.
Translated by Ethan Harkness
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
Ursula K. le Guin in The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas proposed a thought experiment of a utopian city whose existence depended on one child held captive in a dungeon. When taken to extremes, Le Guin suggests, utilitarian logic violates some of our deepest moral intuitions. Even the greatest social goods — peace, harmony and prosperity — are not worth the sacrifice of an innocent person. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), since leaving office, has lived an odyssey that has brought him to lows like Le Guin’s dungeon. From late 2008 to 2015 he was imprisoned, much of this
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and