It is both amusing and sad to see the latest sorry attempt by KMT and PFP legislators to push for a speedy launch of "direct links" -- a proposal to directly amend the relevant statute to accomplish that end.
President Chen Shui-bian's (
Their fears have been increased by what they interpret as an "unprecedented" friendly comment by Chen Yunlin (
Some opposition lawmakers are already interpreting Chen Yunlin's comments as indicative of a major change in China's Taiwan policy. They claim that Beijing will no longer demand acceptance of the "one China" principle as a precondition for links. It is naive to assume a major policy change based on one official's comment -- especially given Beijing's consistent position in this regard for decades. There is also the risk that China may be using deliberate ambiguity in order to lure Taiwan into some sort of trap.
Quite a few opposition lawmakers are lobbying to have private groups or associations associated with them represent the government in negotiations with China over direct links. Their motives, however, appear to be based more on the fear of being left out of the history books than on patriotism or duty. Everyone wants to make sure they get noticed, even if it is only by endorsing the proposal for a legal amendment on direct links.
Trying to force direct links through a change in the law would only create more problems, while doing little to accomplish its intended goal. It is absurd to think that cross-strait negotiations could either be held after such an amendment was passed or be forgone entirely. Official permission from Beijing is required before ships or airplanes from Taiwan could enter China's territory and that permission isn't going to be given without negotiations. Just look at what happened after Taiwan approved the opening of the "three small links" -- Beijing just ignored the gesture.
Passing a legal amendment and then holding negotiations would be extremely disadvantageous to Taiwan. What would Taipei have to negotiate with if its position is marked out and announced ahead of time?
Opposition lawmakers are creating more trouble for the government by trying to interfere where there is no need for them. Their actions are also harmful to the people of Taiwan. Once again they are placing their own selfish interests ahead of the nation's.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under