The run-up to the upcoming football World Cup to be held in South Korea and Japan presented an opportunity and a mood deemed favorable for resuming negotiations on air links between Taiwan and South Korea. A potential win-win situation, however, has ended in defeat for both sides because South Korea is overly concerned about Beijing's reaction.
Plans to operate charter flights between Taiwan and South Korea during the World Cup by Taiwan's domestic carriers have been in the works for some time. But the current number of such flights by Taiwan's domestic carrier Far Eastern Transport (遠東航空) is significantly less than originally proposed, while numerous other Taiwanese airlines remain excluded from the route. It appears that most Taiwanese soccer fans will have no choice but to stay in Taipei and watch the Cup on TV.
Air links between Taiwan and South Korea were halted in 1992, when South Korea switched diplomatic relations to Beijing. The situation has dragged on for nearly a decade. After numerous rounds of negotiations, South Korea's nervous adherence to the "one China" policy has contributed to a failure to find common ground and mutual trust.
In its determination to stick to the "one China" principle, South Korea has deliberately downgraded official contacts with Taiwan and the status of official negotiators. It has been fussy about the wording of contracts (disallowing words relating to territory and sovereignty) and has been generally wary about China's reaction as far as every aspect of Taiwan-South Korea relations is concerned.
The obstruction of First lady Wu Shu-chen's (
More importantly, the South Korean side has circumvented the appropriate negotiation channels and tried to influence negotiations through business and non-governmental channels. In fact, both South Korea's former and current representatives in Taipei have repeatedly pressured Taiwan's foreign ministry -- via legislators, media and private businesses -- to force Taiwan to the negotiating table. This frequently leaves Taiwan's negotiators and diplomats grinding their teeth. Fortunately, Taiwan's decision makers have been able to resist this pressure and hold their ground.
During a meeting with members of the South Korean parliament last week, President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) said matters regarding the resumption of Taiwan-South Korea air links should be handled on the basis of national dignity, substantive interests, equality and mutual benefit. In fact, these principles have always underpinned Taiwan's position and South Korea has always tried to evade them.
Given the deepening economic relations between Taiwan and South Korea, a smooth resumption of air links is certainly in the best interests of both sides. Aviation rights, however, are an extension of sovereignty to begin with. South Korea does not recognize Taiwan's sovereignty because it has established diplomatic relations with China. If South Korea therefore believes, or simply pretends, that Taiwan's sovereignty does not exist, then there is no possibility for the resumption of air links.
Lo Chih-cheng is executive director of the Institute for National Policy Research.
Translated by Scudder Smith and Francis Huang
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under