On May 7, a group of PFP legislators charged that mobilizing the public to go to Geneva to push for Taiwan's entry into the WHO is a waste of public funds. They labeled the campaign a "pleasure trip for vote captains" intended to reward certain doctors who obviously favor Taiwan independence.
These people clearly don't understand the history of Tai-wan's efforts to join the WHO, and their allegations about grassroots mobilization for this cause are ridiculous.
In 1972, when Taiwan withdrew from the WHO, official contact with the organization was lost, making it very difficult to maintain links with the world on health issues. Taiwan's authorities were left with no immediate way to learn of threats to public health and no way to act promptly to guard against such threats. For these reasons, Academia Sinica member Lee Chen-yuan (李鎮源), the founder of the Medical Professionals Alliance (醫界聯盟), started a drive to support Taiwan's participation in the World Health Assembly (WHA), the WHO's highest decision-making body, as an observer.
Since this movement started in 1997, grassroots medical organizations have been at its heart. All the participants have acted voluntarily, using their own funds and soliciting donations, mobilizing friends in the medical community at home and abroad, and lobbying the US Congress and other relevant bodies. We have been working without complaint or regret, year after year, for six years.
Our grassroots medical lobbying delegations have accompanied government representatives to Geneva to attend the WHA meeting. Time after time, China has interfered with Taiwan's efforts to apply for observer status. Every year Taiwan's bid fails to even make the agenda.
Finally, in the last two years, due to the hard work and careful planning of our grassroots delegation, which has accompanied the government's inter-ministerial team, we have received the support of US President George W. Bush. The US Congress passed a resolution supporting Taiwan's participation in the WHO and the international community is taking our cause seriously. Voices continue to emerge from around the world in support of Taiwan's becoming an observer to the assembly, proving the effectiveness of our efforts.
The strange thing is that just as support for Taiwan from the international community is growing and China is feeling severe pressure, noises are emerging from the pro-unification faction within Taiwan, especially the PFP. One can't help but wonder whether they are acting as pawns for China.
It is perfectly right for elected public representatives to closely monitor the public purse. If the PFP has crossed the line by scheming to unite with the communists against Taiwan, the people will inevitably cast them aside. Last year, a PFP legislator-at-large known as the "hospital legislator" also participated in the delegation's activities. If there was any corruption involved, he would know as well as anyone.
The temperature in Geneva in May is below 10? Celsius. A crowd from Taiwan's grassroots delegation demonstrates in front of the main gate of the UN's European Headquarters, sometimes enduring cold rain and bitter wind. They hold their banners, chant slogans and distribute leaflets. It is extremely tough.
Our delegation doesn't need the blessing of PFP legislators, but they should ask themselves how it is possible that our passion for Taiwan, our willingness to make sacrifices for Taiwan and the fact that we have never requested government financial support for our activities could be construed as wasting public funds or as a "pleasure trip for vote captains."
Chung Kun-ching is a doctor and the head of the Central Taiwan Society.
Translated by Ethan Harkness
During the US-India Strategic Partnership Forum’s third leadership summit on Aug. 31, US Deputy Secretary of State Stephen Biegun said that the US wants to partner with the other members of the Quadrilaterial Security Dialogue — Australia, India and Japan — to establish an organization similar to NATO, to “respond to ... any potential challenge from China.” He said that the US’ purpose is to work with these nations and other countries in the Indo-Pacific region to “create a critical mass around the shared values and interest of those parties,” and possibly attract more countries to establish an alliance comparable to
On August 24, 2020, the US Secretary of Defense, Mark Esper, made an important statement: “The Pentagon is Prepared for China.” Going forward, how might the Department of Defense team up with Taiwan to make itself even more prepared? No American wants to deter the next war by a paper-thin margin, and no one appreciates the value of strategic overmatch more than the war planners at the Pentagon. When the stakes are this high, you can bet they want to be super ready. In recent months, we have witnessed a veritable flood of high-level statements from US government leaders on
China has long sought shortcuts to developing semiconductor technologies and local supply chains by poaching engineers and experts from Taiwan and other nations. It is also suspected of stealing trade secrets from Taiwanese and US firms to fulfill its ambition of becoming a major player in the global semiconductor industry in the next decade. However, it takes more than just money and talent to build a semiconductor supply chain like the one which Taiwan and the US started to cultivate more than 30 years ago. Amid rising trade and technology tensions between the world’s two biggest economies, Beijing has become
With a new White House document in May — the “Strategic Approach to the People’s Republic of China” — the administration of US President Donald Trump has firmly set its hyper-competitive line to tackle geoeconomic and geostrategic rivalry, followed by several reinforcing speeches by Trump and other Cabinet-level officials. By identifying China as a near-equal rival, the strategy resonates well with the bipartisan consensus on China in today’s severely divided US. In the face of China’s rapidly growing aggression, the move is long overdue, yet relevant for the maintenance of the international “status quo.” The strategy seems to herald a new