After Taiwan was put on the US government's Special 301 Watch List this year, the Ministry of Justice launched a major anti-piracy crackdown on May 1 aimed at eradicating intellectual property rights (IPR) violations.
Given all the slogans and talk about developing a "knowledge economy," it's a good thing that the government is taking the lead in protecting intellectual property rights. However, "anti" anti-piracy and "anti-Microsoft" protests are emerging among Taiwan's student, teachers and social activist groups. Why should they oppose the "anti-piracy" movement? Because they have no choice but to use Microsoft software even though many of them cannot afford to buy such expensive software. The government's crackdown is triggering a grassroots backlash.
Many social activists and teachers have criticized the justice ministry for acting as Microsoft's hired gun. They have also demanded that Microsoft provide commercial software free of charge. The "anti-piracy" debate now centers around one assumption -- that there is only one software company in the world, Microsoft, and without Microsoft, the computer world will come to a halt."
Microsoft's strategy has been to give away free software and then, after consumers have become accustomed to using its software, to bundle many different sets of software together and sell them at high prices. Consumers are thus forced to buy pieces software that they do not need.
But will the computer world really come to a halt without Microsoft? There are many other companies providing similar products. People in Taiwan are not alone in wanting non-Microsoft options, as seen in the growing boycott of the Windows operating system in favor of the open-code Linux system. To replace Microsoft Office, Sun Microsystems will soon roll out a Chinese-language version of its SunOffice software, while IBM also has the Lotus software. As for Web browsers, Netscape functions just as well as Microsoft's Explorer.
Microsoft's monopolistic tactics made Bill Gates the world's richest man, but his company's predatory practices are highly controversial. The US government filed and then settled an anti-trust lawsuit against Microsoft, while nine US states have yet to reach a settlement with the company. Taiwan's Fair Trade Commission is also investigating Microsoft's monopoly. The PRC government has refused to buy Microsoft's software, opting instead for Linux
products.
Having advocated "openness" and "pluralism" in its political and educational reforms, people in Taiwan should understand that "pluralism" means having a large variety of choices that lead to the same goal. Equating Microsoft with computers is counter to the spirit of openness and pluralism. If Microsoft is too expensive, teachers should teach their students how to look for alternative tools, instead of demanding free copies of the software. They should also be teaching their students to respect IPR.
The anti-anti-piracy groups are of the opinion that educational institutions are entitled to free "fair use." They may well have an argument, but they are going about it the wrong way. They should ask the government to set up a budget or impose an education tax and buy legal software from Microsoft at a bulk discount. An alternative would be to use cheaper software such as Linux.
Computers can run without Microsoft. IPR is essential to a knowledge-based economy. There is no such thing as a truly free lunch. The "anti-anti-piracy" movement is a small detour for Taiwan's march toward a knowledge-based economy, but it can provide the basis for full debate over the value of knowledge.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under