In the light of the success of South Korea's online gaming industry, the Executive Yuan recently proposed a plan to develop the digital-content industry. The proposal calls for the government to invest NT$4 billion in infrastructure development for the industry and to set up a digital-content industrial park in Taipei. The proposal anticipates that in five years' time, digital content will command a market worth more than NT$210 billion. But my comment on this ambitious proposal is, "Great vision, poor implementation."
It is undoubtedly far-sighted to develop the vision to make Tai-wan the center of digital-content innovation and production. Content is king. With the popularity of the Internet and the advent of third-generation mobile-phone systems, telecommunication carriers are desperate for digital content, be it animation, movie clips or online games. And as the only truly democratic country in the Chinese-speaking world, Taiwan does have a great chance of becoming the Chinese Hollywood. While the government has a grand vision, however, it appears not to know how to realize it, and this ignorance could be fatal to Taiwan's digital-content industry.
Recognizing the potential of digital content, the US government has passed several laws to help the digital content industry grow. The DMCA (Digital Millennium Copyright Act), in particular, which protects the integrity of digital-rights management (DRM) systems, is essential if digital-content production is to be profitable.
One might wonder how digital-content production can be a sustainable industry, given that all we hear about is how rampant piracy is destroying our entertainment industry. MP3s, file-sharing Web sites and software make copying and downloading digital content easier and easier, and massively reduce the incomes of record companies and artists.
US scientists created DRM systems, which use encryption technology to prevent copying and unauthorized distribution, precisely to combat piracy. Knowing that technology has its limits, the US government passed the DMCA, which makes it a criminal offense to destroy, or publish information about how to destroy, a DRM system.
Taiwan, by contrast, is not preparing to create this crucial legal infrastructure. It spends money on digital-content research projects, while cutting the already limited subsidies to TaNet, which links educational centers in the nation. In fact, due to the cut, there has been much discussion in Internet forums about whether students are entitled to use TaNet for digital-content creation and sharing. These young digital content producers are condemned to using TaNet for "noneducational purposes."
The people who really know digital content are the younger generation, who have grown up with digital technology. They posses the necessary creativity and powers of innovation to create content digitally. With one of the best campus networks in Taiwan, for example, National Chiao Tung University -- an engineering-oriented school -- could lead in the creation of popular digital content. If it can make good digital content, so could other humanities - and arts- oriented universities if they were provided with a good digital environment.
If the government wants to develop the digital-content industries it must provide university students with high-speed Internet connections and provide funds for schools to buy the necessary hardware and software to create content -- digital videos, digital cameras, editing software and so on. By investing in young people now, our society can get more from the booming digital-content industries pioneered by such people in the future.
Kevin Shih is a graduate student in the graduate institute of economics at National Tsing-hwa University.
With its passing of Hong Kong’s new National Security Law, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) continues to tighten its noose on Hong Kong. Gone is the broken 1997 promise that Hong Kong would have free, democratic elections by 2017. Gone also is any semblance that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) plays the long game. All the CCP had to do was hold the fort until 2047, when the “one country, two systems” framework would end and Hong Kong would rejoin the “motherland.” It would be a “demonstration-free” event. Instead, with the seemingly benevolent velvet glove off, the CCP has revealed its true iron
At the end of last month, Paraguayan Ambassador to Taiwan Marcial Bobadilla Guillen told a group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators that his president had decided to maintain diplomatic ties with Taiwan, despite pressure from the Chinese government and local businesses who would like to see a switch to Beijing. This followed the Paraguayan Senate earlier this year voting against a proposal to establish ties with China in exchange for medical supplies. This constituted a double rebuke of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) diplomatic agenda in a six-month span from Taiwan’s only diplomatic ally in South America. Last year, Tuvalu rejected an
South China Sea exercises in July by two United States Navy nuclear-powered aircraft carriers reminds that Taiwan’s history since mid-1950, and as a free nation, is intertwined with that of the aircraft carrier. Eventually Taiwan will host aircraft carriers, either those built under its democratic government or those imposed on its territory by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN). By September 1944, a lack of sufficient carrier airpower and land-based airpower persuaded US Army and Navy leaders to forgo an invasion to wrest Taiwan from Japanese control, thereby sparing Taiwanese considerable wartime destruction. But two
As Taiwan is engulfed in worries about Chinese infiltration, news reports have revealed that power inverters made by China’s Huawei Technologies Co are used in the solar panels on the top of the Legislative Yuan’s Zhenjiang House (鎮江會館) on Zhenjiang Street in Taipei. However, what is even more worrying is that Taiwan’s new national electronic identification card (eID) has been subcontracted to the French security firm and eID maker Idemia, which has not only cooperated with the Chinese Public Security Bureau to manufacture eIDs in China, but also makes the new identification cards being issued in Hong Kong. There might be more