The controversy over the secret National Security Bureau (NSB) accounts, triggered by the alleged embezzlement of funds by former NSB chief cashier Liu Kuan-chun (
It is true that the matter centers around whether the law has been broken. Any legal issues of course have to be clarified, and there is absolutely no need for the DPP to cover up any legal mistakes.
Some legislators have entered into a selfish game with the media, leaking confidential documents and possibly harming national security.
The whole incident has exposed the lack of a system for monitoring intelligence budgets. The root cause of this is that, even after the NSB's existence was acknowledged and formalized, budget allocation and management continued to follow the procedures established during the authoritarian era, making legislative supervision difficult.
There are two ways to strengthen the supervision of intelligence activities. One way is to strengthen external supervision, and the other is to improve internal control and management procedures. A strengthening of external supervision by means of laws regulating the protection of state secrets and the oversight of state intelligence is being widely discussed, as are both the setting up of a group for supervising classified budgets under the auspices of the National Defense and the Foreign and Overseas Chinese Affairs Committees, and the establishment of an intelligence supervisory committee. This committee would have the powers to review allocations for each classified budget item. Legislators will be given further supervisory responsibilities, and once a leak of classified information occurs, they will be accountable under criminal law.
Members of the National Defense Committee, however, already review the NSB budget annually at a confidential meeting, but it is still difficult to get a full picture of classified parts of the budget. Difficulties in monitoring secret intelligence budgets have much to do with legislators' lack of expertise. If the legislature establishes an intelligence committee, it will still be fumbling in the dark, just as it does annually in the current confidential meetings. The consequence of this is that it ends up simply providing legal protection for inappropriate classified budgets. Furthermore, legislators have no interest in reviewing the budget-closing process. They have not done so for over a decade and it is therefore impossible to monitor budget execution. If the expertise of legislators is not improved, and if the habit of not reviewing the budget-closing process persists, an intelligence committee will have about as much success rooting out budgetary malpractices as it would trying to squeeze blood from a stone.
Classified intelligence budgets must remain classified because there are parts that cannot be exposed. The intelligence agencies will try to avoid making them public if they can, try to hide them from the legislature if they can, and generally try to deceive if they can. External supervision will only have a limited effect. In the US for example, which may have the world's healthiest supervision of intelligence activities, weapons could still be secretly sold to Iran without congressional approval and profits used to assist the Contras in Nicaragua. A legislative supervisory intelligence committee will still have only limited effects if the NSB and other intelligence agencies deliberately conceal information. The only possible way to reduce malpractice is therefore to strengthen internal control and management procedures. The DPP should show the public its determination for reform.
Article 24 of the Organization Law governing the NSB states, "Budgets for the National Security Bureau shall be treated as confidential. They shall be reviewed in secret by the Legislative Yuan and incorporated into the budgets of other government agencies. The agencies concerned are to compile and execute these budgets and audit the closing accounts in a confidential manner."
The NSB budget is divided into several items hidden in the confidential budget of the Ministry of National Defense (MND). It is difficult for outsiders to find out the budget total, let alone other details. It is also difficult to obtain receipts or other evidence before expenditure items have been written off in confidential intelligence budgets. In their examination of NSB budget management, the Ministry of Audit (MOA) also adopts the loosest of standards. If budget allocation procedures are not changed, it will still be possible for the NSB to set up secret accounts with surplus funds instead of returning them to the treasury. For fundamental reform, procedures for the allocation of budgets to the NSB must be amended. They must continue to be allocated in a confidential manner, but not by being incorporated into the MND budget. Apart from facilitating supervision by the legislature, this would also facilitate an Ministry of Audit review of the budget-closing process.
The national security services cannot be allowed to operate unchecked, but politicians must not seek publicity by exposing classified information that may be harmful to state security. At best, the formalization of the NSB's status in 1993 only gave the agency a legal foundation on which to stand. Due to its continuous adherence to past methods of operating in the dark, many shortcomings still exist in the procedures for the allocation, execution and closing of budget accounts.
As for the Liu embezzlement case, the most urgent issues are still to repair the damaged intelligence system and to institutionalize the supervision of intelligence activities in order to facilitate a successful transformation of the NSB.
Shen Fu-hsiung is director of the DPP's policy committee and a legislator.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs