Recent media reports have given the public an in-depth understanding of corruption within the National Security Bureau (NSB). The news burst forth in a series of cases, including those of former bureau chief cashier Liu Kuan-chun (
In particular, the case of the media exposing the bureau's secret accounts could be called thoroughly revealing. The reports not only describe in detail the handling of the funds, their movement and their final usage, the stories also back up the charges with photocopies of original documents, which serve as evidence and help put the allegations in context. These reports satisfy the public's "right to know" and their curiosity. Moreover, by removing the veil of secrecy surrounding intelligence activities, the reports fulfill the media's government-supervisory function and pressure the au-thorities to resume operations that abide by the rule of law.
Actually, in order to carry out their duties, intelligence organs should have secrecy to protect their sources and working methods. At times, due to limitations from internal and external factors, they must work on the margins of the law, acting as circumstance requires. However, these characteristics do not imply that intelligence organizations can operate in a black box or transcend the system by rising above the law without submitting to supervision. Thus, putting aside the question of whether the intended use of such funds was proper or in the national interest, it was wrong for the NSB to collect budget surpluses from past years in a secret account to evade the restrictions of budget statements and audits. If corruption or malfeasance did occur, that is all the worse.
The media can indeed play a supervisory role in society by reporting on intelligence scandals and thereby goad the government into remedying shortcomings.
However, reports that are overly specific in their descriptions of matters outside of corruption cases may make friendly governments, organizations and political figures feel awkward or reluctant to go forward with such agreements. This is especially the case with reports that detail sensitive or classified intelligence operations abroad -- such as the use of economic assistance to buy diplomatic recognition or contributions to foreign think tanks or politicians that support Taiwan.
Ultimately, these reports are damaging to pragmatic diplomatic relations and international intelligence cooperation. Furthermore, leaking classified information, exposing government strategy, cutting off foreign aid and generally placing ourselves in dire straits are all obviously beneficial to China and other other enemies.
Freedom of the press is undoubtedly an important indicator of democratic politics and a safeguard of human rights. However, if extended without limit, considerable harm to the national interest may result.
Chang Chung-yung is a professor in the department of security at the Central Police University.
Translated by Ethan Harkness
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry