Cultural swindle indeed
After reading your editorial ("The great cultural swindle," Jan. 11, page 12) I am bound to ask how a state like China can proclaim a "one China" policy while operating under the false pretense that today's China, centered around the Beijing government, represents a national unifier for a common Chinese culture.
As the writer eloquently stated, many nationalities in Asia, including Taiwanese, have an affinity toward China because over the centuries the Chinese have contributed to their own cultures. By the same token, however, and over the same period, these same cultures have contributed to building Chinese culture.
In my opinion, a large factor that lies at the heart of the problem with the PRC government, but more importantly, the Chinese people, is that when a foreign ideology such as communism is adopted by, or forced, onto a people, they loose their own cultural identity.
This usually results in an identity crisis whose victims try desperately to grasp and thus perpetuate a foreign ideology that symbolizes the one aspect left in their current culture that appears to unify them -- even when it is in direct conflict with their deeper cultural heritage.
The most pressing problem for Taiwan with respect to Bei-jing's "one-China policy," is that the international community sometimes seems to assume that China does not have a comprehensive strategy for accomplishing the integration of Taiwan into China, in fulfilment of its policy.
Those of us who keep the most remote of tabs on Beijing's activities regarding the "one-China" policy know that it has effectively garnered international acceptance through a superficially freer market that creates global dependency on the country's vast, cheap labor pool, manufacturing capabilities and resources, as well as through a token level of tolerance for human rights. Though the international community has obviously tried to be cautious about getting into bed with China, it has, because of economics, ultimately had virtually no choice but to do so. The scales of the debate on "one-China" have become tipped in favor of China, despite rhetoric to the contrary. This is exemplified by the acceptance of China into the WTO.
More serious than the overt way in which China seeks to influence the international community is the covert way in which it seeks to ensnare Tai-wan by accepting direct foreign investment from Taiwan and making it very easy for Taiwan-ese industrialists to set up manufacturing bases in China. Tai-wan is basically mired in the same web of dependency on China as that in which much of the rest of the world is entangled and this will make it harder and harder for Taiwan's voice for independence to be heard.
I may be acting alarmist, but I hope that both the world community and Taiwan recognize China's actions for what they are so that Taiwan does not lose its independence.
George Dennis III
Chattanooga, Tennessee
President needs to wake up
Wang Chien-chuang's (
De-sinicization must begin within the DPP itself if Taiwan is truly to leave behind it over 50 years of Chinese political culture, during which corruption, self-interest and dictatorship have been the norm.
Chen has to learn to share his power and responsibility. He cannot save Taiwan single-handedly. Nor can he possess power single-handedly.
Chen Ming-chung
Chicago
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations