A few days ago, Premier Yu Shyi-kun reaffirmed his ideals of promoting a humanist spirit and simplicity in government. The words mirror the man. We have great admiration for the premier, however, we would like to submit our suggestions, to the "combative Cabinet."
Traffic problems are a major concern of the public. Although there is never any shortage of policy suggestions on the issue, many of them are simply rub-bish. Some major projects are proposed in order to fulfil campaign promises, as well as to boost the economy. These construction projects, which cost hundreds of billions of dollars, usually drag on for years.
Other projects are proposed in order to improve local infrastructure. These projects usually wipe out the budgets of local governments. This has gone on now for a few decades, but the public's dissatisfaction with thetraffic situation continues to grow despite the plethora of projects. The problems lie mostly in the uncertainty and inconsistency of transport policy.
The National Eastern Freeway (東部國道), the National Central Cross-island Highway (中橫國道) and the National Southern Cross-island Freeway (南橫國道) construction projects have featured frequently as election issues. But they have never been taken seriously by our transport authorities.
It would also seem premature to welcome the proposed international airport in central Taiwan given the size of its likely market. Given its financial difficulties, the government should not be proposing such a major project which has the effect of causing other construction projects to be neglected. Why propose such a grand project when it is of such questionable value?
It is not good policy to seek to boost tourism in eastern Taiwan by building freeways and allowing cars to rush to the east on weekends and holidays. Local residents may not profit from such investments, while tourist spots may suffer because of large crowds. What we should do is encourage our tourists to use local transport. The government must not ruin the environment of the east by building freeways that are not of much use.
The total budget for the above freeway constructions is estimated to be NT$300 billion. If we were to take one-tenth of that budget to create a special fund to develop eastern Taiwan, annual interest on the fund would be as high as NT$1.5 billion. That would be quite sufficient to enable us to subsidize the tourist industry, as well as to train local tour guides. We truly believe that this is a transport policy that is manageable, practical and feasible.
Last, and most frequently forgotten, the government has lacked the necessary will and therefore failed to make a substantial input into improving traffic in urban areas for many years. As globalization continues, the world's major cities have to compete with one another. A city without an efficient mass rapid transit system will never have an opportunity to play a significant role on the world stage. Insufficient or unpunctual transportation is an economic weakness; chaotic traffic reduces people's quality of life. How can Taiwan attract talent and develop a knowledge-based economy under such circumstances?
Issues ranging from investments in transportation and improvement of bus services to the enactment of the Mass Transportation Act (大眾運輸條例) must all be included in the Cabinet's action plan so that we can develop a highly pragmatic transportation policy.
Wang Ching-ruey is chairman of the Chinese Institute of Transportation; Chiang Yu-sheng is a director of the CIT; Hochen Tan is also a director of the CIT and former executive vice minister of transportation and communications.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry