When the Control Yuan announced the impeachment of National Security Bureau officials for negligence after some of their subordinates absconded with government funds, it once again exposed the lack of appropriate legislative supervision over the intelligence organizations.
Intelligence is an important tool in the preservation of the nation's survival and interests, but owing to its secretive and unique modus operandi, if intelligence work is carried out inappropriately, the public's human rights will be affected. Because of this, Taiwan's intelligence organization really should accept supervision from legislative organizations, and reduce illegal activities.
Democratic countries mainly divide their supervision of intelligence agencies into three categories: executive, internal and legislative. Executive supervision is conducted from departments positioned above the intelligence agencies, such as the US president's Intelligence Oversight Board (IOB) which operates directly under the president, and the UK's Joint Intelligence Committee (JIC), under the Cabinet.
In the UK, committee chairs are filled by senior officials of the Cabinet Office, and are directly responsible to the prime minister. Members include senior-level officials from the foreign affairs, defense, trade and industry, and finance ministries, as well as the heads of the three main intelligence agencies.
Each intelligence organization basically supervises itself. In the US, for example, every intelligence organization designates an internal "supervisor" that works directly under the agency head. These supervisors perform inspections, supervision and auditing, seeking to prevent abuses.
The CIA is unique because it is the only US intelligence agency where the internal supervisor is appointed by the president and approved by the Senate. By law, this internal supervisor must report directly to the president's IOB. In addition, because the numerous intelligence organizations under the US Defense Department, the post of assistant to the secretary of defense for intelligence oversight is set up directly under the secretary.
The UK's Cabinet system uses a permanent undersecretaries committee composed of undersecretaries from each of the different intelligence agencies. The committee operates under the guidance of the JIC, integrating and inspecting the activities of the various intelligence agencies. The UK's intelligence agencies also designate their own supervisors and appraisal committees.
As for the most important supervisory body in the US -- the Congress -- the Select Committee on Intelligence bears the main responsibility for supervising intelligence agencies. Other legislative committees can also supervise intelligence work related to their professional domains.
As for the numerous grey areas of intelligence and counter-intelligence work -- such as the US State Department's numerous "secret operations" -- the foreign and international relations committees of the Congress can de-mand that the department submit a secret operations report.
In the UK, the Intelligence and Security Committee is set up in accordance with the Intelligence Services Act. The committee is formed by members of both the houses of Parliament. Nine of the committee members are appointed by the prime minister. These committees' main functions are to supervise the operations, budgets and administrative matters of the three intelligence departments, the Security Service, Secret Intelligence Service and Government Communications Headquarters.
Of course, with regard to confidential intelligence matters, legislators should have the responsibility of keeping things secret. In the US, for example, Congressional committee members and staffers are not allowed to leak sensitive or confidential information to the outside. In addition, the principle of having the lowest possible number of people present at confidential meetings should be observed, in order to reduce, as much as possible, the participation of unnecessary people.
Although the US does not consider the leaking of secrets by members of Congress a criminal act, those who have leaked secrets without authorization may, following a vote, be expelled from their committees -- or even from Congress.
This sort of congressional self-regulation is extremely deserving of consideration by the Legislative Yuan.
Because intelligence organizations enjoy significant special funding, if they aren't subject to systematic regulations, the problem of the "tail wagging the dog" could easily occur. Because FBI founder J. Edgar Hoover controlled a vast amount of information regarding politicians' private lives, he was able to force the executive branch to do his bidding. For this reason, beginning in the 1980s, the US executive branch has constantly strengthened supervision of intelligence agencies. Perhaps this too, can serve as a useful reference for Taiwan.
Taiwan's intelligence and counter-intelligence regulations are rather chaotic. Scattered about in various laws, these regulations lack an integrated basis. Thus, as our nation becomes a mature democracy, constructing an intelligence supervisory mechanism is the legislature's unshirkable responsibility.
Lee Wen-chung is a DPP legislator.
Translated by Scudder Smith
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs