US President George W. Bush's recent visit to Beijing demonstrates both evolution and continuity in his policy toward China.
The president has recognized the need to tone down his sharp rhetoric, engage Chinese leaders directly and increase consultations with senior Chinese officials on a broad range of issues.
Yet at the same time, Bush remains firm in his commitment to promoting democracy, religious freedom and the rule of law in the world's most populous country. He is also unwavering in his support of the US pledge to provide aid for Taiwan's defense.
Bush has long since abandoned the tough rhetoric he relied on during his campaign and early months in office. Instead of portraying China as a "strategic competitor," the phrase favored by candidate Bush and his foreign policy advisers, the president has endorsed the pursuit of a "constructive, cooperative and candid" relationship with China. He has also realized the importance of treating the Chinese with respect and of acknowledging Beijing's progress in developing the Chinese economy and in improving its people's standard of living.
During his 30-hour stay last month in the Chinese capital, the president publicly expressed admiration for China's "amazing progress" and described Beijing's successful bid to play host to the 2008 Olympics as a wonderful opportunity for China to enhance its international image. After visiting a bus engine factory, he praised the city of Beijing for owning one of the largest natural-gas bus fleets in the world.
This positive portrayal of China's accomplishments is a departure from Bush's depiction of China during the campaign. In a Nov. 19, 1999, speech on foreign affairs, candidate Bush referred to China's conduct as "alarming abroad and appalling at home." He described China's government as "a sponsor of forced abortion and an enemy of religious freedom" and an "espionage threat to our country." These strident views were conspicuously absent from Bush's public statements in Beijing last month.
In his speech to Chinese students at Qinghua University, Bush remained true to his long-standing vow to advance freedom and democracy in China. He urged the nation's future leaders to tolerate dissent and build a society based on the rule of law. In private sessions with Chinese President Jiang Zemin (江澤民), Bush reaffirmed Washington's one-China policy, but he also asserted his insistence that Beijing rely on peaceful means in its quest for reunification with Taiwan. He also reiterated his commitment to the Taiwan Relations Act, which obligates the US to sell sufficient arms to Taiwan to defend itself.
Although Bush has not embraced China as a "strategic partner" as did former president Bill Clinton, he has nevertheless come around to recognizing the value of engaging China, rather than confronting it. In doing so, he followed in the steps of former presidents Richard Nixon, Gerald Ford, Jimmy Carter, Ronald Reagan, George Bush and Clinton, who, regardless of their starting points, eventually adopted a policy of engagement aimed at integrating China into the world community and promoting adherence by China to international norms.
The shift in Bush's approach, however, is primarily one of tone and process; it does not signal a fundamental transformation of the president's view of China. He retains an abiding belief that only a free and democratic China will be a responsible international player and will not pose a threat to its neighbors. He also maintains a strong faith in free trade as an ally in what Reagan termed "a forward strategy for freedom."
"The case for trade is not just monetary, but moral," candidate Bush said in his November 1999 foreign policy speech. "Economic freedom creates habits of liberty, and habits of liberty create expectations of democracy."
Engaging China may prove to be one of the most important challenges facing the world in the 21st century. China's economy is projected to continue to grow at 6 percent to 7 percent during the next 20 years. Its per capita income will continue to lag behind many advanced industrialized economies, but in terms of GDP it is expected to surpass that of all individual European countries within two decades. According to some forecasts, by 2025 the size of China's economy may match that of the US.
The challenges facing the Chinese leadership in the coming decades are momentous, and success is by no means assured. The fourth-generation leadership, which will take power at the 16th Party Congress this fall, must:
-- Implement China's commitments to the WTO.
-- Develop the lagging western provinces.
-- Increase the living standards of its 900 million rural citizens.
-- Integrate rural migration into cities.
-- Address environmental problems such as air quality and water shortages.
-- Check the spread of corruption.
The US should do what it can to assist Beijing in addressing these problems. Economic failure in China would pose a far greater threat to global stability and US interests than economic success.
China's continued economic growth and integration into the world economy offer the best hope for the development of a more pluralistic social and political system in China. As was true in Taiwan, South Korea, Thailand and Chile, a rapidly modernizing economy is likely to generate effective pressure for political change toward democracy.
How Washington deals with China now will determine Beijing's posture toward the US in the future. Apart from economic development, achieving unification with Taiwan is China's No. 1 goal. It is imperative that the US not be seen as unalterably opposed to the integration of the two sides of the Strait. Instead, Washington should stand willing to support any arrangements that are freely agreed by the people on both sides of the Strait. Beijing must accept that Taiwan will join the mainland only when Taiwan judges that there are benefits to doing so. Greater democracy in China will certainly have to come first.
Bonnie S. Glaser is a Washington-based consultant on Asian affairs. She is also a Senior Associate of the Pacific Forum, Center for Strategic and International Studies.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with