On Sept. 21, 1999, a devastating earthquake in Taiwan caused a blackout nationwide, forcing silicon-wafer foundries in the Hsinchu Science-based Industrial Park (新竹科學工業園區) to halt production. The global supply chain was taken by surprise and high-tech shares in New York nosedived as a result. The earthquake unexpectedly made Taiwanese aware of Taiwan's importance in the world economy.
Statistics show that one-fifth of global information technology (IT) products are wholly or partially manufactured in Taiwan, according to Craig Addison in Silicon Shield: Taiwan's Protection Against Chinese Attack. One-third of all chips are also produced in Taiwan. Since these are "strategic components," security across the Taiwan Strait will be important and the US will find it difficult to give up Taiwan as long as the US computer industry is dependent on Taiwan's original equipment manufacturing (OEM). This is a guarantee for Taiwan and the origin of the "silicon shield" theory.
Deplorably, Taiwan's secret weapon, the silicon shield, is now being handed over to China by Taiwanese businesses. Chinese leaders have sensed the power of Taiwan's production capacity, the importance of which has surpassed Middle Eastern oil in recent years. Silicon products have become fundamental materials indispensable for advanced countries. How to disarm Taiwan's industry has become part of Beijing's grand strategy, as well as the main reason behind China's all-out efforts to lure Taiwan's high-tech industry during the past few years.
China's efforts to attract Taiwanese investment have indeed yielded results. Taiwan's China-bound investments, totalling billions of US dollars a year, have made China the world's third biggest producer of IT products, after the US and Japan. Taiwan has fallen far behind China in terms of output value. Although 70 percent of China's IT products are manufactured by Taiwanese companies, it is an indisputable fact that the equipment and technology has been moved across the Strait because those companies are China-based.
China's ultimate goal is the silicon wafer fabs. For the past two-and-a-half years, Beijing has mobilized the kinsmen of China's high-ranking officials to win over Taiwanese businesspeople and enlist Taiwan's wafer management and technical talent. Beijing also intends to make use of the wafer fever to unnerve Western companies into participation. The laissez-faire attitude of Taiwan's government has also aided China's tactics. Despite prohibition and penalties stipulated in law, many cases have been left unsettled for "lack of concrete evidence."
This issue cannot be simply passed off as an irreversible trend because it is unimaginable that no concrete evidence has been found over the past decade regarding the tens of thousands of cases of illegal investments in China. Now the Taiwanese-led, illegally invested wafer fabs in China have finally started operation. They are also snatching orders from Taiwan in cutthroat price competition. Is there really nothing the government can do about them? If that is the case, it is most unfair to law-abiding companies. It will also make a mockery of law and order in Taiwan.
Semiconductors are key components in IT and electronics products and are viewed as a strategic sector by advanced countries. Therefore, restrictions have been imposed on exports of technology and equipment, such as the US restrictions on the equipment for eight-inch fabs using 0.25 microns or smaller etching technology. But, despite being a US ally and relying on US military support, Taiwan has been reckless about China-bound silicon-wafer investment.
Allowing Taiwanese businesses to invest in eight-inch chip fabs in China will quickly bring about a cluster effect, enabling China's fab industry to upgrade its production and overtake its competitors in Taiwan. Helping it will be Taiwanese businesses' well-established personal connections in Taiwan, their contact with Taiwan's technology, Beijing's ambitions and assistance, and the laissez-faire attitude of Taiwan's government. China will replace Taiwan as the global factory of silicon products such as semiconductors and become a partner the US will have to rely on for the sustainable development of its technological economy. At that time, Taiwan's silicon shield will have passed to China's hands.
As a result, the US may well abandon the Taiwan Relations Act, just as it gave up recognition of Taiwan 30 years ago. US businesspeople will become China's lobbyists in Congress, saying Taiwanese businesses have moved west and economic integration between China and Taiwan is complete. Similarly, the US abandoned its recognition of Taiwan following the signing of the Shanghai Communique.
So should we sit back and await our doom? For the sake of the nation's sustainable development, we must construct a mechanism for "effective management" and realize the consensus reached at the Economic Development Advisory Conference (經發會): "Taiwan first, a global perspective and sound risk management." Keep the silicon shield in our hands to safeguard national security as well as people's employment and welfare.
Huang Tien-lin is a national policy adviser to the president.
Translated by Jackie Lin
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry