With no one willing to run against him last month, Hong Kong Chief Executive Tung Chee-hwa (董建華) automatically won another five-year term. According to the regulations, a candidate must be nominated by at least 100 members of the 800-strong election committee set up by Beijing. Tung was nominated by 714 members or almost 90 percent. Obviously, committee members wanted to curry favor with Tung and avoid offending Beijing.
Nevertheless, no one else could have be nominated to run against Tung. This was what the Chinese communist regime called a democratic election.
Tung's "election" on Feb. 28, or "228," was not a good sign. For a long time, 228 has been a symbol of sadness in Taiwan. The fact that Hong Kong, which wants to be Taiwan's role model for "one country, two systems," chose that date for the election indicates an appalling lack of political wisdom among those involved.
In coordination with this farce, Tung put a great deal of effort into creating an appropriate atmosphere, using the media to shape his image as being close to the people, while declining requests to participate in public forums, lest he make blunders under open questioning. More-over, Beijing has repeatedly thrown its support behind Tung and said it was willing to give economic benefits to Hong Kong. It was planning to establish a China-Hong Kong free trade zone and considering allowing Chinese investors to speculate in the territory's stock market.
Most importantly, scapegoats must be found for Tung's admin-istrative failures. Hong Kong's civil servants -- the "residue British evil" -- are the scape-goats, and the sacking of former chief secretary for administration Anson Chan (
However, economic figures have failed to erase Tung's disastrous incompetence. According to figures released by Hong Kong's Census and Statistics Depart-ment, unemployment between November last year and January this year was 6.7 percent, a new record high for Hong Kong and higher than the figures for Taiwan, Japan, South Korea, Singapore and even the official figures for China. Tung and Financial Secretary Antony Leung (梁錦松) were forced to admit that the unemployment rate is continuing to rise.
Meanwhile, the government's financial deficit has been worsening by the day. It is a structural deficit, mainly due to further integration between Hong Kong and China since the territory's handover in 1997. The integration has reduced tax, investment and land sale revenues. Over a long period, deflation has not been redressed and government spending has not been cut.
According to an announcement last month by the finance task force reviewing the government's public policy, Hong Kong's financial situation was already in an alarming state. This year's deficit will be HK$66 billion, while the next 20 years will score more than HK$50 billion in deficits each. Financial reserves will run dry in fiscal 2008 and 2009.
Hong Kong was shaken by the news, but scholars were suspicious of the government's moti-vations. They believed the figures were exaggerated and meant to scare Hong Kongers -- just like the exaggerated numbers released two years ago of possible applicants for residency. The administration had released those figures before asking Beijing to overturn a ruling by Hong Kong's Court of Final Appeal on the residency status of children born in Hong Kong to Chinese parents.
This time, the exaggeration was meant to build public support for salary cuts in the civil service and the imposition of a consumer tax. In coordination, the administration threw up reports from time to time about the laziness and waste in the civil service, creating public dissatisfaction as well as support for salary cuts and layoffs.
On the other hand, highlighting its rule by business tendencies, Tung's government has even gone against tradition by siding with business and playing an interventionist role in the economy. For this reason, Tung's government has received kudos from business circles as well as pro-Beijing scholars or scholars who favor planned economies. But after the new interventionist policy was announced, an editorial in the Asian Wall Street Journal called it "A dark day for Hong Kong."
Paul Lin is a political commentator based in New York.
Translated by Francis Huang
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.