In the six months since the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, the US has certainly outperformed the expectations of most at the wake of the attack -- at least according to its own national interests.
If it had been the goal of the perpetrators to prove the fallibility of the US, they accomplished their mission. However, the attackers also created a situation in which the US proved that, while it may not be invincible, it remains the sole superpower. All talk about the ability of other major powers to check the power of the US has essentially been mooted.
Much to the dismay of the "Great China" fanatics on both sides of Taiwan Strait, China is no exception. All their predictions and hopes that the US would compromise its posture (particularly with respect to Taiwan) in order to enlist Beijing's support in the anti-terrorism campaign have been proven wrong. This was amply demonstrated by President George W. Bush's remarks during his recent visit to Beijing.
Of course, China's support for the anti-terrorism campaign, while lukewarm and reserved at best, has had a price tag. Beijing's efforts to link the East Turkestan and Tibet independence movements with terrorism have been rebuffed by the US and many other countries. Nevertheless, it has created such a linkage in its state-run media and is pushing ahead with crackdowns in those areas with renewed vigor. Bei-jing also failed to coerce the US into paying a ransom with a higher value to American security interests in the region, namely, Taiwan.
Yet the US-Sino relationship is at its best in years. The lip service that China pays to the anti-terrorism cause has little to with this. It is more a result of Bush's claims to endorse a new "constructive, cooperative, and candid" relationship. It might also be due to China's realization that the US was able to carry out its war on terrorism pretty much on its own so far, although several nations have contributed troops to the fighting in Afghanistan and are cooperating in efforts to freeze the financial transactions of groups and organizations linked to terrorism. That kind of military and political prowess is something China can only dream about.
Things appear to be looking good for the US and Bush for the moment on all other fronts as well. The American economy has begun to rebound from the downturn that was aggravated by the Sept. 11 attack. In recent opinion surveys, 80 percent of the American people have expressed their unwavering support for their government's actions.
The question for the US then becomes what next? While the war on terrorism has proven the ability of the US to act unilaterally, it must think long and hard about how far it wishes to go down that path. As Bush indicated in his speech on Monday, the fight against terrorism must now enter a new phase under which the US seeks to uproot al-Qaeda cells in the Philippines, Georgia and Yemen. But since al-Qaeda allegedly has cells in as many as 60 countries, the reach of the campaign could expand exponentially. To ensure the stability of the world order, the US must do more to assuage the concerns of its allies about the proposed expansion of its theater of anti-terror operations and to help rebuild Afghanistan.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under