No matter how hard we try, political correctness seems to elude us. Take our page 1 lead headline yesterday "Hokkien should be given official status, says TSU." Hokkien? We did consider the alterna-tives. "Hoklo" is linguistically more accurate, but not immediately recognizable to many of our readers. "Taiwanese" has problems in that it sounds like the language of the people of Taiwan as a unitary group and there is of course no such thing. "Minnan?" Why use a Mandarin name when it is the very cultural imperialism of Mandarin in the life of Taiwan that the Taiwan Solidarity Union's movement seeks to undermine. "Fukienese" is surely something spoken in China -- the language we are trying to name is spoken in Taiwan and contains many words from Aboriginal languages and Japanese that the variant spoken in Xiamen-Zhangzhou does not. So, what's an editor to do?
Defer to a higher authority, perhaps. The problem is that there is no higher authority that doesn't have an ax to grind on this issue. Normally the editor's bible for Taiwan-related stuff is the Government Information Office's ROC Yearbook. But the GIO was long the stormtrooper of KMT/mainlander/Mandarin cultural hegemony. This might have changed with the change of government -- we await the 2002 Yearbook with interest. But one thing the Yearbook does tell us is that Taiwan has two distinct types of Hakka, two distinct types of Hokkien, a third version of Hokkien which is a mixture of the other two, and of course at least nine Aboriginal languages. And of course there are those who speak only Mandarin.
So that isn't much help. But it does at least suggest that the linguistic situation in Taiwan is far richer and more complex than the TSU lawmakers referred to in our headline admit. We sympathize with their end, which is of course to break the Mandarin-based cultural hegemony -- which still survives -- imposed on this island by the colonial KMT regime, but are deeply skeptical about their means. It seems unfair to elevate Hokkien to the status of an official language and not give Hakka similar treatment. And while Aboriginal languages are many and spoken by few, all Han Chinese in Taiwan would do well to remember that the Aboriginals were here first and are victims of a historical injustice that the "Taiwan for the Taiwanese" movement -- of which the TSU is the most vociferous part -- unsurprisingly keep very quiet about.
What particularly disgusts one about the TSU plan is that that the party's lawmakers want the Ministry of Education to expand the amount of Hokkien studies in schools. Let us be clear, expand the amount of time spent on mother-tongue education by all means, the more the better. But that is very different from studying Hokkien exclusively. Why should Hakka and Aboriginals be forced to learn yet another language not their own, forced on them by another powerful group? The TSU's proposal sounds exactly like cultural imperialism imposed by Hokkien speakers to replace the cultural imperialism of Mandarin speakers.
And yet there is one realm in which change beyond increasing mother-tongue education might usefully be made -- in the public service. It is high time that the public-service exam contained a section on mother-tongue proficiency, in effect ensuring that all recruits to public service were proficient in Mandarin -- still the lingua franca, whatever the TSU might wish -- and another language of Taiwan. The result would surely be a public service more responsive to the public it serves, with an intake which would better reflect Taiwan's ethnic diversity. It would also have the advantage of giving mainlanders -- at least those who wanted a public service career -- an incentive to study one of the nation's languages and hopefully better integrate into society thereby. Now there is an objective the TSU might honorably pursue.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
Ursula K. le Guin in The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas proposed a thought experiment of a utopian city whose existence depended on one child held captive in a dungeon. When taken to extremes, Le Guin suggests, utilitarian logic violates some of our deepest moral intuitions. Even the greatest social goods — peace, harmony and prosperity — are not worth the sacrifice of an innocent person. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), since leaving office, has lived an odyssey that has brought him to lows like Le Guin’s dungeon. From late 2008 to 2015 he was imprisoned, much of this
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and