Taiwan's policies on trade and economic development in China have changed significantly since the Economic Development Advisory Conference (EDAC, 經發會) came up with its four fundamental principles: Taiwan first, a global perspective, mutual benefit and win-win solutions, and sound risk management -- and formulated the "active opening, effective management" policy.
On Nov. 23 last year, the government lifted its ban on investments in China in the production of 122 items, including high-end laptop PCs, 3G mobile phones and CD-ROMs. On Nov. 30, the ban on another 1,004 items was lifted. In December, manufacturers of 52 state-of-the-art products, such as light-emitting diodes (LEDs), as well as 636 categories of petrochemical, medical and chemical products, were allowed to invest in China.
But this extensive liberalization did not satiate the voracious appetite of businesspeople to "go west." Whether silicon-wafer fabs should be allowed to migrate across the Taiwan Strait is again the topic of a fevered debate.
I am not opposed to enhancing cross-strait trade and economic relations, but I fear that while we relentlessly pursue "active opening," the other half of the equation, "effective management," has yet to manifest itself. The scholars and officials advocating more liberalization have never mentioned the EDAC consensus on "Taiwan first" and "sound risk management."
What is particularly disturbing is that liberalization advocates criticize those calling for effective management for "fanning the flames of confrontation," "fettering and damaging the nation" and "leading Taiwan toward a political impasse." Some even say the issue highlights Taiwan's need for rational debate.
Secretary-General to the Presi-dent Chen Shih-meng (陳師孟) said that all political parties need more opportunities to reflect on the issue. Unfortunately, his unbiased viewpoint was attacked by the "go west" crowd. He was pushed so hard that he had to qualify his stance by saying, "[It's] only a suggestion and does not mean a public hearing will be held over the issue of eight-inch wafer fabs."
The fact that a request for a public hearing failed to evoke a rational response proves that the capacity for rational debate has indeed been lost. It also reveals the root cause of that loss.
Technicians and executives in Taiwan's industrial parks oppose moving wafer plants to China, but they don't speak because they are worried about their jobs. The heads of companies that supply the wafer industry also believe there is no pressing need to move eight-inch wafer fabs to China. But they keep silent lest they irk Beijing and affect their business opportunities in China. Some research and academic organizations are staying silent to avoid offending their sources of fund-ing. This is proof that Taiwan, pressured by the Chinese market and Beijing's policies, has completely lost the capacity for rational debate. As a result, the consensus on cross-strait economic issues has gradually tilted toward active opening, without any mechanism for effective management being established.
The silicon-wafer industry is the only industry in which Taiwan has excelled on a worldwide scale in recent years. It is also the pillar supporting Taiwan's economy. Whether to allow investments in eight-inch wafer fabs in China, how to implement such a liberalization and what conditions should be enforced are central to the questions of whether or not Taiwan's industries are destined to be hollowed out and whether the nation's economic growth can be sustained.
These are also the most thorny and fundamental issues affecting Taiwan's management of cross-strait trade and economic relations over the past decade. Since they affect the welfare of Taiwan's 23 million people, let's give them plenty of room for rational debate.
Huang Tien-lin is a national policy advisor to the president.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry