What a shame that Guinness World Records does not have an entry for the most arcane topic on which to hold a street demonstration. Were this sad omission otherwise, then Taiwan could capture another world first tomorrow as a group of university professors and engineers take to the streets. Their grievance: that the government will allow Taiwan companies to manufacture eight-inch silicon wafers in factories in the PRC. Yes, they're mad as hell and they're not going to take it any more.
This is not to say that the eight-inch wafer issue does not pose genuine questions. But we cannot help but think that these are better dealt with in boardrooms than in the street.
The recent controversy over eight-inch wafer production in China has been notable for its sloppy logic even by Taiwan's less-then-exacting standards. For instance, we have seen Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU) lawmaker Chen Chien-ming (
Why this should be so is baffling. Eight-inch technology is far from being cutting edge. In fact, the major reason why companies such as UMC and TSMC want to move across the Strait is because they are upgrading rapidly to far more advanced 12-inch wafer technology. This leaves them with a lot of highly expensive, semi-obsolete equipment they can either sell for a song to the Japanese or South Koreans, who will use it to set up fabs in China, or use themselves to cash in on China's demand for lower-grade chips.
For Taiwan to retain eight-inch technology would in fact be detrimental to its industrial upgrading. And this process of upgrading has involved the repeated removal of manufacturing technology across the Strait. There was a time when Taiwan was the world's leading supplier of computer mice, dial-up modems, CD-ROM drives, 14-inch monitors -- the list is long. While these were cutting-edge items with a high markup, they were made in Taiwan. As they became commoditized and margins fell, their manufacture moved to China. What makes eight-inch wafer technology any different?
Just as specious an argument as it gets is that of the Taiwan Association of University Professors, which said earlier this week that it recognized that eight-inch wafer manufacturing would eventually move across the Strait, but that this should not happen until the changeover to 12-inch wafers was complete because it would exacerbate unemployment.
We wonder if the association could answer a few questions. For a start, we know that the electronics industry accounts for half of Taiwan's exports, but we wonder what percentage of its workforce are involved in the manufacturing of eight-inch wafers. Just what kind of rise in unemployment might we be looking at? And how many of these potentially-unemployed are Taiwanese rather than overseas-contract workers? Unless we have figures, how can we assess the real impact?
A second question: How are we to find space in the science parks, currently bursting at the seams, for the 12-inch industry without some dismantling of the eight-inch industry it is to replace. Yes, there will be some unemployment -- there usually is with structural change. But it would be utterly irresponsible to risk the long-term prospects of the chip industry just to massage current employment statistics.
Finally there is the security argument, which appear to be a conflation of the two arguments already looked at. The TSU says that letting Taiwan companies set up eight-inch wafer fabs in China will damage national security by upgrading the technology of the enemy and causing increased unemployment a home. Frankly, we fail to see how turning Taiwan into a museum of outdated wafer technology -- which seems to be what the TSU is proposing -- is going to thwart the menace from Beijing.
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s