Two years after the first change in ruling parties in Taiwan, the DPP is at a major crossroads as it attempts to chart its future direction. The most fundamental question facing the party is whether it should it integrate its operations by having the president of the nation simultaneously serve as party chairman.
Is anyone really surprised that DPP Chairman Frank Hsieh (
As the first person from the DPP to be president, Chen enjoys overwhelming support within and without the party. However, attempts to coordinate with the party about national policy has largely been a failure, as amply demonstrated by the inability of the nine-person task force of high-ranking DPP members from the party headquarters, the Presidential Office and Executive Yuan to play any meaningful role in policymaking. The group was set up to help integrate and coordinate the party and the administration.
Hsieh has made it clear that Chen is the one calling the shots. When asked whether he will run for re-election as party chairman, Hsieh said the decision was up to the president. When asked about the contradiction between the integration proposal and Chen's promise during his presidential campaign to withdraw from party activities if elected, Hsieh said campaigns are the party's biggest task and there is no need to help Chen out of his promise now since he stumped so heavily for the party's candidates last December. Basically Hsieh was saying that since Chen is in essence the underground chairman of the party, he might as well get the public title too.
While one can sympathize with the coordination problems the DPP has experienced with the Chen administration, the suggestion that the president add the party chairmanship to his list of duties must be resoundly rejected. Taiwan is still trying to rectify problems created by the KMT's long history of mixing national and party business -- witness the debate over the KMT's acquisitions of its assets. Under the Chiang family's autocratic rule, Chiang Kai-shek (
While integrating party and government machinery this way may, as argued by Hsieh, improve government efficiency, the price is simply too great. To do so would not only harm the image of the DPP but it would be a major step back from Taiwan's democratic achievements. The concentration of too much unchecked power in the hands of anyone is never considered a good thing. Plus, as the president of the country, it is only right that Chen remain somewhat, if not completely, above and beyond routine party operations.
While in many democracies, such as Britain, the head of the ruling party is also the prime minister, the DPP can easily find examples of the separation of roles between a nation's elected leader and the head of its ruling party. Unfortunately for Hsieh, such examples also highlight the fact that party chairpeople are usually completely overshadowed by the elected leader -- who are seen as the nominal heads of their parties. Can anyone -- off the top of their head -- name the chairman of the US Republican Party?
Perhaps the DPP, and the nation, would be better served if the Taiwan's political parties began to view their chairpeople as the chief executive officer of the organization, rather than as the embodiment of the party's political aspirations.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry