In an experiment in which respondents from different areas were asked to estimate the diameter of a coin, the intuitive estimates from respondents in slum areas were significantly larger than those made by respondents in wealthy areas. We might choose to interpret this as a result of psychological projection or of the personal circumstances of individuals. In either case, however, it reflects the complexity of issues concerning human beings. Simi-larly, the computerized lottery that was launched Jan. 17 provides a glimpse into the human condition.
People's explanations of events can be roughly divided into two types, theories of predisposition and theories of circumstance. Gamblers, for example, often feel that it is external circumstance rather than any lack of self-restraint on their part that leads to excessive behavior. Then, once the behavior becomes compulsive, they believe that their repeated inability to resist temptation comes from abiding characteristics inherent in their persons. In fact, specialists disagree about whether compulsive behavior is ultimately brought about by predisposition or is involuntary.
According to theories of predisposition, there are three primary components of excessively indulgent behavior: cravings or an urge to behave obsessively, a loss of control and a persistence with the behavior in question despite deleterious consequences.
This kind of gambling-control theory often highlights bizarre cycles arising in an individual's control systems. The more an individual gambles, the greater the chance he will lose control. And the more an individual experiences a loss of control, the more he throws himself into behavior surrounding gambling. The problem is that to attribute gambling exclusively to individual addiction and to evade public responsibility by labeling the problem as a psychological disorder is to oversimplify the matter.
As far as theories of circumstance are concerned, research shows that there are often serious consequences when gambling venues become more easily accessible or new lottery outlets open. Individuals may, for example, increase the frequency of their gambling as it becomes more convenient to do so, or they may simply spend more money on gambling. It is also possible that those who do not gamble will begin to develop the habit and that reformed gamblers will fall off the wagon.
For these reasons, with lottery fever continuing to rage, a recent proposal by some lottery vendors to open 24-hour ticket kiosks is cause for concern.
If we consider the interactions between individuals and their circumstances, there may be a number of reasons why lottery players believe that with a ticket in hand, their potential is infinite.
First, they overestimate the probability of winning. The media's incessant sensationalization of the winners creates a feeling of euphoria and acts as a catalyst to create an illusory sense of control.
Second, they may believe that by buying tickets from outlets that have sold winning tickets in the past, some of the fortune will rub off on them, or they may even believe good luck flows from person to person and will eventually come to them.
Third, they may believe that by continuing to gamble, they can increase their chances of winning and recover the costs.
Fourth, society creates a collective myth. Before the winning numbers are revealed, there is the sense that everyone has a chance. The media's sensationalizing of the countdown to the draw stimu-lates buying.
Due to the multiple obscuring effects and a lack of clear reference points, individuals constantly magnify their biased fantasies of winning a large prize.
Fifth, in lives that have become somewhat unpredictable, gamblers stake all hope on one last chance of redemption. Gradually, they form a dependent relationship with the lottery.
We could say that lottery fever is a naive form of optimism, a belief that good fortune will one day come knocking. Or we could say that it is cynical pessimism, a belief that life is hard and short and that one should enjoy life in the here and now.
Both responses reflect widespread feelings of uncertainty and risk in our daily lives. Under these circumstances, can it be that there are no other options apart from gambling with fate or throwing restraint to the wind?
Gambling is not merely a moral issue in which the focus is on whether individuals should gamble or not. It is a social issue as well. The gambling industry and its consumers come at a price -- in broken lives and public debts. The costs of our folly will be paid for by generations to come.
The recent wave of lottery fever can't be dismissed as a fait accompli because the government doesn't know who buys tickets and hence cannot take remedial action. This is an issue of inter-generational justice. When we put our money down to buy a hope, we are also rolling the dice on our futures.
Lin Yao-sheng is an assistant professor in the department of psychology at Kaohsiung Medical University.
Translated by Ethan Harkness
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry