No justice, no peace
Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou's (馬英九) commentary ("Reflection upon the 228 Incident," Feb. 28, page 8) demands a swift rebut-tal. While he has apparently read some of the primary source documents regarding the event, he nonetheless fails to grasp the essence of the problem.
Ma's first mistake is to focus on the initial stage of the 228 Incident, when there was a popular uprising against the corrupt governor Chen Yi (陳儀). He notes, no doubt correctly, that some Taiwanese leaders called upon citizens not to target mainlanders for their ethnicity, and that some "mainland intellectuals" supported the cause of the Taiwanese people. He says these facts "highlighted the bright side of human nature."
However, the terrible part of the 228 Incident was not the events of the uprising itself, when the violence was sporadic and disorganized. It was only when the military crackdown began that people died in their thousands -- and they were killed systematically by KMT troops on the orders of Chiang Kai-shek (
By any normal definition, these acts were crimes against humanity, and they are therefore punishable in all jurisdictions with no statutes of limitation. But in fact not one single person has ever been put on trial for any of the deaths. No wonder there is no sense of justice for society, and no sense of closure for the victims and their loved ones.
Moreover, the KMT government forbade even the mention of the words "228" until the early 1990s (when Ma was already well established in the KMT hierarchy).
Those who defied the ban were summarily arrested, imprisoned, exiled, or even killed. Meanwhile, the guilty were promoted and rewarded by the regime. Unable to assign guilt to the actual perpetrators, and facing this officially orchestrated whitewashing campaign, it was legitimate for victims to blame the KMT regime as a whole for their suffering. It is also understandable that some of that feeling was transferred to mainlanders in general, who benefited from special privileges under that regime and whose public spokespeople led the cover-up operations.
The Taiwanese of 1947 could see with their own eyes which mainlanders were guilty and which were also victims. But the subsequent actions of the KMT government blurred this distinction, thereby creating the ethnic tensions that reverberate to this day. In his long career in the KMT, Ma took no action to address this problem, even when he was minister of justice. If he now wants to do something constructive, he should call for the arrest and prosecution of all those perpetrators who are still alive.
What will bring the "unity" Ma appears to seek are not more "condolences to the victims," but an end to the impunity of those who committed heinous crimes against humanity.
Bo Tedards
Taipei
Residency `rights' lacking
I was pleased to read that the government is considering relaxing the permanent residency rules so that more than 800 foreigners who do not qualify under the current requirements, could do so under the relaxed restrictions proposed by KMT Legislator Apollo Chen (
However, as the first foreigner in Hsinchu and the first American in Taiwan to receive the Permanent Residency Per-mit (Card No. 013501, issued April 21, 2000 ), I am more concerned with the long-term implications of what having this permit means. Even though I now have the right to live in Taiwan for the rest of my life without a visa, I am still barred from receiving several social services and benefits -- and even voting in local elections.
To make allowances for foreigners who are ROC permanent card holders, the Ministry of Interior must also adjust the rules that require a Chinese ID card for many government services. Before rushing to create a class of second-class citizens in Taiwan by relaxing the permanent residency rules, the ministry should first ensure that those "permanent residents" are entitled to the same rights as Taiwanese.
Ted Knoy
Hsinchu
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.