Dear Prime Minister Koizumi:
On Christmas Day, Japan's Foreign Minister Makiko Tanaka told a press conference: "I think the Chinese people have the wisdom of taking time concerning political issues. Hong Kong was returned to China and the situation was resolved quietly, and I hope the Taiwan issue will be handled in a similar manner. Japan as a neighboring country and the rest of the world should make efforts so that the issue will be resolved peacefully."
Tanaka's remarks betray her ignorance about many aspects of the Taiwan issue. First, only 13 percent of the 23 million people on Taiwan consider themselves strictly Chinese. A great majority of the Taiwanese people have clearly rejected unification with the People's Republic of China (PRC) under the Hong Kong model of "one country, two systems." Taiwan, like Japan, is a free-market democracy. The Taiwanese people have struggled long and hard against the Kuomintang dictatorship with blood and tears to win their freedom. They will not peacefully give up their freedom and willingly subject themselves to Beijing's repressive rule.
Second, Chief Cabinet Secretary Yasuo Fukuda reaffirmed that Japan's basic position concerning Taiwan remains unchanged:
"There is a principle on how our country deals with this matter. As in the [1972] Japan-China joint communique, China asserts that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, and Japan fully understands and respects this stance."
Japan's position is basically the same as the US position which states that the US "acknowledges" China's claim. Neither the US nor Japan has "recognized" China's stance. Both countries have taken note of China's claim without formally accepting it.
As Japan's Foreign Minister, Tanaka should have been aware of these nuances of diplomatic language. Her lack of diplomatic experience and sophistication means she is a liability for your administration.
Mr. Taku Yamasaki, secretary general of the Liberal Democratic Party, was right in criticizing Tanaka's comments as overstepping Tokyo's policy of not taking sides on differences between Beijing and Taipei. "As the foreign minister, she should refrain from making statements that may be interpreted as interfering in domestic affairs, which would exceed the government's policy," Yamasaki told the Nihon Keizai financial daily.
Third, Tanaka's remarks work against Japan's strategic and security interests. Each day hundreds of merchant ships and oil tankers pass through the sea lanes on both sides of the Taiwan Strait. The sea lanes and the airspace around Taiwan are the lifelines of Japan and South Korea. If Taiwan were to fall into PRC hands, China will be in a position to choke off Japan's lifelines. Unless Japan wants to become a protectorate of China, offering its financial and technological resources upon demand to the new hegemon of Asia, Taiwan's security is ultimately Japan's security as well. Can a person who fails to grasp such an elementary strategic reality be qualified to serve as Japan's foreign minister?
Finally, as you said yourself, the Japan-US security alliance is the linchpin of peace and security for East Asia. The Bush administration understands the strategic importance of Taiwan to both Japan and the US. That is why President Bush has declared that the US will help defend Taiwan, "whatever it takes." It is in America's interest to preserve the status quo in the Taiwan Strait, at least until the PRC evolves into a peaceful democracy. US policy is peaceful resolution, not peaceful unification. It seems clear Tanaka has not cleared her statements beforehand either with you, Japan's Prime Minister, or with the US State Department or the White House. The US has heavy responsibilities: to guarantee the security of East Asia while fighting a war against terrorism in Afghanistan and elsewhere. The US does not need a Japanese Foreign Minister declaring a brand new policy which parrots Beijing's position and which is diametrically opposed to US interests at such a critical time. Tanaka's careless remarks have undermined US confidence in Japan as a reliable ally.
Mr. Prime Minister, we respectfully request that you formally reprimand Foreign Minister Tanaka for her wrongful remarks and also take the opportunity to re-emphasize Japan's neutrality in the dispute between democratic Taiwan and Communist China.
With best wishes for a joyous and prosperous New Year to you and to Japan.
Respectfully yours,
Li Thian-hok
Li Thian-hok is the pen name for a prominent member of the Taiwanese American community and a commentator based in Pennsylvania. Reprinted with permission from the Jan. 3, 2002 issue of China Brief, a publication of the Jamestown Foundation, a research institution based in Washington, D.C.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations