After the disastrous month of September, when terrorist attacks and retaliation contributed to storm clouds over the global economy, November demonstrated the resilience of globalization. The global economic downturn has led most of the world to rally together, not only in the hunt for the terrorists, but in reinforcing global cooperation. Several events in November give hope for a stronger international community, with consequent economic benefits.
First, more than 100 countries assembled in Marrakech, Morocco, to complete a unique UN agreement to limit global climate change. These countries agreed to reduce their emissions of greenhouse gases in order to slow the process of global warming.
Yes, the US is not yet a party to the agreement -- even though America is the world's biggest single contributor to greenhouse gas emissions. Yet the fact that the world could agree despite the absence of the US may prove promising. No single country, even the largest economy in the world, can stop the cooperation of others. Sometime soon, the US is likely to rejoin these international discussions.
ILLUSTRATION: YUSHA
Second, the world community welcomed China as a member of the WTO. For hundreds of years, China held itself aloof from the world economy. Then, in the middle of the 19th century, China suffered at the hands of European imperial powers, which gained technological and industrial superiority over China, using this to force trading concessions from the Ching Dynasty.
For more than a century after that, China was in turmoil. Only 20 years ago did China decide to rejoin the world trading system. This month's entry of China into the WTO is a major step in that process. China has now rejoined the world community as a cooperative, stable, and powerful sovereign nation, which will be one of the leading trading countries in the years ahead.
Third, more than 140 nations agreed in Doha, Qatar to launch a new round of trade negotiations. After years of global protests about free trade, the world's nations chose trade over protectionism. Importantly, developing countries achieved several breakthroughs in the new trade agenda. Poor countries won concessions on access to essential medicines; and they pressed for, and received, promises that rich countries would address protectionist policies in several areas.
Fourth, the war in Afghanistan has not only proceeded rapidly on the ground, but has led to a diplomatic breakthrough as well. The UN will play a central role in the reconstruction of a working government in that country, and in coordinating humanitarian assistance for the Afghan people. The growing role of the UN in this process puts the seal of international law and diplomacy over the global struggle against terrorism, and helps to reassure many countries that this is a true international effort, not just the US acting alone.
While these seem to be a grab-bag of achievements, they point to a single message: the world community is finding new ways to cooperate, even against a backdrop of terrorism and global recession. The growing role of international institutions under the UN umbrella provides greater confidence that disputes can be addressed peacefully and even sensibly, with significant inputs of scientific expertise as in the Climate Change treaty. No country wants to be outside of this global process. China's membership in the WTO is sure to be followed by Russia's membership in the coming years.
Academic scholars and political observers debate whether globalization is a real phenomenon or a slogan; whether globalization is beneficial or harmful; and whether globalization is a fragile process that could be reversed or a robust process likely to gather force in the coming years. My view is that globalization is a powerful and generally positive force. It offers countries the gains from increased international trade, faster diffusion of technologies to mutual benefit, and hopes for less cross-country violence and conflict. The agreements in November suggest that most of the world shares such hopes, and is ready to commit political resources into the success of the process.
Of course globalization requires international governance and rules. It cannot be a game of rich against poor. It cannot function without international law and international institutions. Therefore the preeminence of UN institutions in so many events in November is notable. The UN has shown its value in global environmental management, international trade, state building and reconstruction, and humanitarian assistance. UN agencies will have a critical role to play in future years in helping Africa's impoverished countries (and those elsewhere) to derive larger benefits from globalization.
This month, in short, has been a fitting prelude to the happy occasion on Dec. 13th when UN Secretary General Kofi Annan and the UN organization itself share this year's Nobel Peace Prize in Oslo, Norway. The prize is a fitting measure of the role that the UN now plays and must continue to play in promoting a successful and peaceful globalization.
Jeffrey D. Sachs is the Galen L. Stone Professor of Economics and director of the Center for International Development at Harvard University. copyright: project syndicate
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with